Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-20518House OversightFinancial Record

Internal email hints at alleged abuse, payoff and cover‑up involving unnamed parties and the Terramar Project

The passage contains a brief internal email chain that references alleged direct abuse, a payment to silence a victim, and a potential denial strategy. It names a few individuals (Philip Barden, G. Ma Email discusses alleged direct abuse and a payment to silence the victim ('JE paid her off') Mentions a need for a 'cogent denial' for litigation and reputational reasons References the Terramar Proj

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #030295
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains a brief internal email chain that references alleged direct abuse, a payment to silence a victim, and a potential denial strategy. It names a few individuals (Philip Barden, G. Ma Email discusses alleged direct abuse and a payment to silence the victim ('JE paid her off') Mentions a need for a 'cogent denial' for litigation and reputational reasons References the Terramar Proj

Tags

abuse-allegationmedia-influencereputation-managementfinancial-flowlegal-strategypayoffterramar-projectmedia-involvementlegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: 6 Maxwe lt Sent: 1/11/2015 1:25:56 PM To: J Jep [jeevacation@gmail.com] Subject: Fw: THE TERRAMAR PROJECT FACEBOOK TWITTER G+ PINTEREST INSTAGRAM PLEDGE THE DAILY CATCH From: Philip Barden (RT Sent: Sunday, 11 January 2015 05:27 To: <a Cc: G Maxwell Subject: Re: Saying nothing is reputational suicide. Even iff is discredited by i people will know JE paid her off and believe G was complicate absent a credible denial. Now it is reported that G engaged in direct abuse - as I feared would happen. Next reports to the authorities will be made. It is necessary from a litigation, investigatory and reputational reason to issue a cogent denial. I can see why JE doesn't want this as it may not suit him but he is already toast. Philip Sent from my iPhone On 10 Jan 2015, at 18:42, ' en Wrote: Had Geordie on the phone half a dozen times today. He would have give us a better hearing than most I figure. Strongly believe saying nothing is the wrong thing - especially as Dershowitz has a big piece coming in The Times on Monday. Rest up and speak Monday Best Ross Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.