Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement with U.S. Attorney’s Office and alleged federal protection of co‑conspirators

The passage reveals a federal non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Jeffrey Epstein and his co‑conspirators from federal charges, includes specific dates, officials (U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acost Epstein signed a non‑prosecution agreement on Sep 24 2007 with the Southern District of Florida U.S. Agreement granted a 30‑month sentence and immunity from federal charges in exchange for a state pl

Date

November 11, 2025

Source

House Oversight

Reference

House Oversight #010578

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

Persons Referenced (3)

Nadia Marcinkova

“...The co- conspirators procured minor females to be molested by Epstein. One of the co-conspirators - Nadia Marcinkova -even participated in the sex acts with minors (including E.W.) and Epstein. See Incident Report, E...”

Jeffrey Epstein

“discussions, on September 24, 2007, Epstein signed an agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida. Under the...”

Alexander Acosta

“...the U.S. Attorney’s Office to do so and delayed entry of his plea. See Letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Lilly Ann Sanchez, Dec. 19, 2007 (Exhibit “L”). 29. On January 10, 2008 and again on May 30, 20...”

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

discussions, on September 24, 2007, Epstein signed an agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida. Under the agreement, Epstein agreed to plead guilty to an indictment pending against him in the 15™ Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County charging him with solicitation of prostitution and procurement of minors for prostitution. Epstein also agreed that he would receive a thirty month sentence, including 18 months of jail time and 12 months of community control. In exchange, the U.S. Attorney’s Office agreed not to pursue any federal charges against Epstein. See Non-Prosecution Agreement (Exhibit “K”). 27. Part of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that Epstein negotiated was a provision in which the federal government agreed not to prosecute Epstein’s co-conspirators. The co- conspirators procured minor females to be molested by Epstein. One of the co-conspirators - Nadia Marcinkova -even participated in the sex acts with minors (including E.W.) and Epstein. See Incident Report, Exhibit “A”, at 40-42, 49-51; Deposition of Nadia Marcinkova, April 13, 2010, (hereinafter ““Marcinkova Depo.”) at 11 (Deposition attachment #9). 28. | Under the Non-Prosecution Agreement, Epstein was to use his “best efforts” to enter into his guilty pleas by October 26, 2007. However, Edwards learned that Epstein violated his agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office to do so and delayed entry of his plea. See Letter from U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta to Lilly Ann Sanchez, Dec. 19, 2007 (Exhibit “L”). 29. On January 10, 2008 and again on May 30, 2008 E.W. and L.M. received letters from the FBI advising them that “[t]his case is currently under investigation. This can be a lengthy process and we request your continued patience while we conduct a thorough investigation.” Letters attached at Composite Exhibit “M”. This document is evidence that the FBI did not notify E.W. and L.M. that a plea agreement had already been reached that would 13

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement with U.S. Attorney’s Office includes immunity for co‑conspirators and alleged violations

The passage reveals a federal non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Jeffrey Epstein and his co‑conspirators from federal charges, mentions direct involvement of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and s Epstein signed a non‑prosecution agreement on Sep 24, 2007 with the Southern District of Florida, av The agreement allegedly protected co‑conspirators, including Nadia Marcinkova, from prosecution. A

Dept. of JusticeFeb 21, 2019

Epstein

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. _____________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's

33p

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01695623

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown