Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-21030House OversightOther

Interrogation transcript discussing cooperation against a figure named Jeff

The passage contains a vague, fragmented interrogation about a low‑level suspect offering cooperation to build a case against someone called Jeff. It lacks concrete names, dates, financial details, or Speaker offers to cooperate in exchange for reduced charges. Discussion of contacting ex‑friends of "Jeff" to build a case. Mention of potential misdemeanor vs. second‑degree felony charges.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #019181
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains a vague, fragmented interrogation about a low‑level suspect offering cooperation to build a case against someone called Jeff. It lacks concrete names, dates, financial details, or Speaker offers to cooperate in exchange for reduced charges. Discussion of contacting ex‑friends of "Jeff" to build a case. Mention of potential misdemeanor vs. second‑degree felony charges.

Tags

law-enforcementcooperationcooperation-incentivecriminal-procedurelegal-exposurehouse-oversightwitness-interview

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
rERSON t thing, okay? Now, you came The question we have for you ue cooperating with us and try ist Jeff? y going to help me in the long itted to a second-degree felony, What’s going to keep me out of p me out of trouble. I’ve already > ‘ith that.... ed myself. I can go two ways. I which is going to put me at— second-degree felony against me. ith it and maybe get myself some What would the odds be of you 2? Have you had any contact with itact— of’em....[ had a phone call about dl told my parents. Look, | sweat —like, no connection with him at ch got my number changed. I have jon with him. It stopped. that’s good. That’s good that you , 64 Fittuy Ricw This is what we'd like to do: We would like to reach out to some of your ex-friends and [unintelligible] talk to them. Now, the question is, do we think that they are currently still working for Jeff, in which case they would make a phone call to Jeff? Or can we just kinda show up and, you know, have you make a call as we're standing outside and say: “Hey, you know, these guys wanna talk to you, and I've already told em everything?” Our goal is to make a better case against Jeff, all right? ’ RECAREY: With your cooperation. FRICK: Let me, let me get back to—past—the cooperation thing, okay? There are lesser charges that can easily be filed: leading to the delinquency of a minor, as compared to a second-degree felony. You know what I mean? That’s a mis- demeanor.... First of all, I'll tell you straight up, okay, we're not going to take you to jail today.... DOBBS: Not today. FRICK: Well, you’re—And here’s the other thing: If you cooper- ate and if we can—If you cooperate, whether we pull it off or "4 not—that’s not up to you, that’s up to us, okay? So what we would do is if we ended up charging you with like a misde- meanor, we'd give you a call, we'd say: “Hey, you gotta come in, you know.” RECAREY: You sign it... FRICK: That's our preference. You come in, you've been very forthright with us, you've been very up front— : RECAREY: Very truthful. _ FRICK: Do you want us to call your parents, or do you want to deal with it, or do you—As far as we're concerned youre an 65

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.