Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-2117House OversightLegal Filing

The plaintiff argues that Ghislaine Maxwell has not provided sufficient information about the crimin...

The plaintiff argues that Ghislaine Maxwell has not provided sufficient information about the criminal investigation to justify staying discovery, and that the potential claims resolution program does not require staying discovery in this case. The court has previously recognized that discovery may be necessary to inform the claims resolution program.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-2117
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The plaintiff argues that Ghislaine Maxwell has not provided sufficient information about the criminal investigation to justify staying discovery, and that the potential claims resolution program does not require staying discovery in this case. The court has previously recognized that discovery may be necessary to inform the claims resolution program.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Motion to stay discovery due to a parallel criminal investigationPotential claims resolution program for Jeffrey Epstein's victimsGhislaine Maxwell's discovery obligations in a civil case
0Share
PostReddit

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.