Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-21348House OversightFBI Report

Allegations of Government‑linked Fraud by Scott Rothstein’s Firm Involving High‑Profile Names

The passage suggests possible collusion between a convicted fraudster’s firm and government agents, mentions contacts with Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, and hints at undisclosed communications with t Scott Rothstein (convicted fraudster) allegedly used false sex allegations to solicit $30 M from inv Claims that Rothstein’s firm received information from current FBI agents. Names of high‑profile f

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #025543
Pages
1
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage suggests possible collusion between a convicted fraudster’s firm and government agents, mentions contacts with Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, and hints at undisclosed communications with t Scott Rothstein (convicted fraudster) allegedly used false sex allegations to solicit $30 M from inv Claims that Rothstein’s firm received information from current FBI agents. Names of high‑profile f

Tags

investor-scamsgovernment-corruptionfinancial-flowforeign-influencelegal-misconductpolitical-figuresfbilegal-exposuregovernment-collusionhouse-oversightfraud

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
] have shown poor judgment in the past, and have paid a heavy price for those mistakes. I had hoped to move forward with my science philanthropy and helping those less privileged than myself. Then came Scott Rothstein. Scott Rothstein was the senior partner of RRA. He is currently serving a 50 -year prison sentence for perpetrating the largest fraud in South Florida’s history. He decided that sex allegations made against me could be used to fleece hundreds of investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars. He recruited Brad Edwards, a smalltime Ft. Lauderdale attorney who had access to some of the women on the government list. eo stetr forged Judges signatures, bate behind attorney client privilege, secrecty of legal docu, work product, cover letter; giving illegal investigative activity the protection normally reserved for lawyers and their legitimate clients. He falsely told investors that I had settled cases with him for hundreds of millions of dollars, but the women wanted their money right away. If they gave him 30 million dollars now, he could give part of it to the women who wanted to remain anonymous, they would go off into the sunset with their money, and the full payment would be made to the investors. Investors that would be getting 50- 100% return on their money for taking advantage of the same women who allegedly had come in contact with me. Bill Schere, an attorney in Broward, has filed 147 complaints against Scott Rothstein and the firm. The attorney for the women, aware that I would be loathe in involve innocent friends in problems that were strictly of my own making, subpoenaed names and tried to smear any friend or mine whose name appeared in print previously. They contacted Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, David Copperfield; innocent bystanders with no knowledge of any of my actions whatsoever. | settled the cases rather than forcing both the women and others to be subject to a public questioning of their lives. It appears that the Rothstein firm had continuing help from the government throughout their civil litigations. Emails re as aresult of a recent subpoena show descriptions such as, “received info from current FBI agents”. The former Rothstein partners subpoenaed my attorney for all correspondence regarding my plea with the US attorney. Though highly unusual, the government sided with the former Rothstein partners and agreed we needed to produce all the correspondence between the government and my attorneys. During the civil deposition of my former houseman, Alfredo Rodriguez, attended by a new attorney from the Rothstein firm, whose name appears on the record as CARA Holmes, [also appears as Carolyn Holmes, also appears as Kara Holmes], the houseman allegedly said that he had stolen a book from my house with telephone numbers in it that the government wanted. This was in July of 2009. I believe that

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...

The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema

39p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY JAMES EDWARDS

19p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 09-34791-RBR

39p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...

The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive

23p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH

38p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.