Deposition Transcript of Bradley J. Edwards in Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein Litigation (Palm Beach, FL)
The document provides a formal deposition record linking Jeffrey Epstein to a civil case against Scott Rothstein and other defendants, confirming the existence of litigation and identifying attorneys Deposition taken on March 23, 2010 in a case titled Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Identifies plaintiff’s counsel Robert D. Critton, Jr. and defendant’s counsel Jack Alan Goldberger
Summary
The document provides a formal deposition record linking Jeffrey Epstein to a civil case against Scott Rothstein and other defendants, confirming the existence of litigation and identifying attorneys Deposition taken on March 23, 2010 in a case titled Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Identifies plaintiff’s counsel Robert D. Critton, Jr. and defendant’s counsel Jack Alan Goldberger
Persons Referenced (3)
“...M BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG - Complex Litigation, Fla.R.Civ.Pro. 1201 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, EXAMINATION DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT Plaintiff, “yee VOLUME I OF I BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE SCOTT...”
Bradley Edwards“...VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video record. This is Media Number One in the videotaped deposition of Bradley Edwards in the matter of Jeffrey Epstein versus Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. Today is Tue...”
Alfredo Rodriguez“...RDS, ESQUIR EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE Tuesday, March 23, 20010 10:00 - 5:07 p.m. PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ 211 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 2139 Palm Beach Lakes; Boulevard PLAINTIFF'S EX. 2 COMPLAINT 239 West Palm B...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (7)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
fla.r.civ.pro(561) 832-7500(561) 832-7506401-5012561.659.8300561.686.6300561.842.2820Related Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40 EXHIBIT 16 EFTA00081180 Case 9:08-cv-807m091349pept Z91-15 _EriterM ocp WERocisstifolf/E15 Page 2 of roio-< uoc 16q0,3 e 0 EXHIBIT C Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts EFTA00081181 Case 9:08-cv-807ailaVs kigsyffigt 28415-c1p6Arger phri N 7NRocieatgfe)10/§815 Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXKMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY I EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein's required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on wh
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
#291874/mep
DS9 Document EFTA00788219
Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...
The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.