Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-21876House OversightOther

Casual email discussing probability as a force, no substantive investigative leads

The passage consists of informal correspondence about abstract concepts of probability and physics, with no mention of influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers no actionabl Conversation between two private individuals about theoretical ideas. No references to public officials, corporations, or government agencies. Contains no dates, transactions, or concrete allegations

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #025185
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage consists of informal correspondence about abstract concepts of probability and physics, with no mention of influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers no actionabl Conversation between two private individuals about theoretical ideas. No references to public officials, corporations, or government agencies. Contains no dates, transactions, or concrete allegations

Tags

physics-analogypersonal-emailprobability-theoryhouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] Sent: 1/20/2017 1:04:00 PM To: David Grosof Subject: Re: Your Special Day Importance: — High god - so he does play , just not with fair dice On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:44 AM, David Grosof (i wrote: Is there something for central tendency that is like an inertial reference frame, from which a different abstract understanding of probability develops, one that's better for showing the kloodgey, apparent force nature to which you point? Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone. On Jan 20, 2017 4:32 AM, "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: yes ,now assume that there i a balancing force. and gravity is merely the result of paticles being pushed together . etc On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:26 AM, David Grosof TE wrote: http://xked.com/123/ can't resist! Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone. On Jan 20, 2017 4:14 AM, "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: probablity and statistics gets its strengh from the law of large numbers ._ centrifigal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. . like gravity. lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. . not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would . could be a force similar to the EM one. On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM, David Grosof qq wrote: Cool. And the former question, of clarification? Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone. On Jan 20, 2017 4:10 AM, "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: pretty well On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM, David Grosof <q wrote: Probability as a force rather than a what? Didn't suss out the next word... Watson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk ~4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well? Dz Please forgive typos. Sent from Android Nexus 6 phone. On Jan 20, 2017 2:47 AM, "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: 1. is probability a force rather than a markter. if you look ata bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that. 2. all signals

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com
URLhttp://xked.com/123
Wire Refreference

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.