Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-22043House OversightOther

Defamation lawsuit filed by [REDACTED - Survivor] against Ghislaine Maxwell

The passage merely outlines a civil defamation complaint with no new factual allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. It provides basic jurisdictional details but no actio Giuffre alleges Maxwell made false statements calling her a liar. The case is filed in the Southern District of New York under diversity jurisdiction. Damages sought exceed $75,000.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015532
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage merely outlines a civil defamation complaint with no new factual allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. It provides basic jurisdictional details but no actio Giuffre alleges Maxwell made false statements calling her a liar. The case is filed in the Southern District of New York under diversity jurisdiction. Damages sought exceed $75,000.

Tags

ghislaine-maxwelldefamationcivil-litigationvirginia-giuffrelegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 2 of 12 Plaintiff, VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, formerly known as [REDACTED] (“Giuffre”), for her Complaint against Defendant, GHISLAINE MAXWELL (“Maxwell”), avers upon personal knowledge as to her own acts and status and otherwise upon information and belief: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This suit arises out of Defendant Maxwell’s defamatory statements against Plaintiff Giuffre. As described below, Giuffre was a victim of sexual trafficking and abuse while she was a minor child. Defendant Maxwell not only facilitated that sexual abuse but, most recently, wrongfully subjected Giuffre to public ridicule, contempt and disgrace by, among other things, calling Giuffre a liar in published statements with the malicious intent of discrediting and further damaging Giuffre worldwide. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 2. This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court. 3. This Court has jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332 (diversity jurisdiction) as Giuffre and Maxwell are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds seventy-five thousand ($75,000), exclusive of interest and costs. 4, This Court has personal jurisdiction over Maxwell. Maxwell resides in New York City, and this action arose, and defamatory statements were made, within the Southern District of New York. 5. Venue is proper in this Court as the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this Court.

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:15-CV-07433

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.