Court hearing on defamation claim involving Adelson and reference to Giuffre

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 96 H3vlgiu2 THE COURT: Well, what do you say about the case that's been cited? MS. SCHULTZ: Well, about Adelson? I would say that it's factually distinguished because here she is two days later reiterating her defamatory statement. And I would also direct you to the case in my brief, Wheelings v. Iacuone. THI ira] COURT: Let me just get the time frame right. MS~ SCHULTZ: Sure « THI ira] COURT: The initial statement is January, and when is this? MS. SCHULTZ: So, your Honor, the email that went to the media, it was first issued on January 2, 2015; it was published on January 3, 2015; and the statement took place the next day, on January 4, 2015. THE COURT: Okay. MS. SCHULTZ: A recent opinion in this district, the Wheelings case, makes it clear that you can't reargue summary judgment on a motion in limine and also makes it clear that you can't say, oh, because one person THE COURT: The issue is, was the second statement defamatory? MS. SCHULTZ: I think that was an issue at summary judgment that Ms. Giuffre opposed in its entirety, and I think that's already been resolved. = THE COURT: How? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011399