University of Utah law professor vouches for document in House oversight hearing

Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 18 Q. Quinney, got that one wrong, College of Law at the University of Utah. Is that indicating your signature to the document? A. That's -- that's indicating not my signature, but it's indicating that I stand behind the arguments made in the document, yes. Q. Much more articulate statement than I. I simply wanted to confirm that you had authorized your name to be listed as a counsel who was, for purposes of the rules, vouching for this document? A. Yes, I was vouching for this document completely. Q. Okay. And you list here your address as being at the college of law at the University of Utah with no qualification. If you compare that to the next exhibit, Exhibit 1 actually -- A. Yes. Q. -- your signature has a footnote that says, this daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only, and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the university of Utah; do you see that? A. I do see that. Q. Why was that footnote not included on the first pleading filed which is Exhibit 2? ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021841