Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-22587House OversightOther

Defendant objects to document requests about alleged lies by Jane Doe #3 and a dropped Palm Beach State Attorney case

The passage references vague allegations—Jane Doe #3 allegedly lying about many world leaders and a State Attorney dropping a case due to credibility concerns—but provides no specific names, dates, or Allegation that Jane Doe #3 has told lies about many world leaders (unspecified). Claim that the Palm Beach County State Attorney dropped a case based on a detective's assessment of Defendant assert

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014105
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage references vague allegations—Jane Doe #3 allegedly lying about many world leaders and a State Attorney dropping a case due to credibility concerns—but provides no specific names, dates, or Allegation that Jane Doe #3 has told lies about many world leaders (unspecified). Claim that the Palm Beach County State Attorney dropped a case based on a detective's assessment of Defendant assert

Tags

state-attorneycredibility-assessmentworld-leaderscredibility-disputelegal-objectionpotential-foreign-influence-unlegal-exposurehouse-oversightdocument-request

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 22 of 34 12. Copies of any and all documents evidencing that Jane Doe #3 “has also told lies about many world leaders” as described in paragraph 8 of the sworn Declaration of Alan M. Dershowitz. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Document Request because it misstates paragraph 8 of the sworn Declaration of Alan M. Dershowitz, which expressly states that “on information and belief, [Jane Doe #3] has also told lies about many world leaders.” (Emphasis added). Defendant further objects to this Document Request because it seeks documents already in Plaintiffs’ possession and/or that are publicly available. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing specific objections and the General Objections, Defendant responds by reference to statements by Jane Doe #3 reflected in the media, which are equally available to Plaintiffs. 13. Copies of any and all documents evidencing that “the State Attorney in Palm Beach County dropped a case that she sought to bring based on an assessment by the investigating detective regarding the ‘victim’s lack of credibility’” including a copy of the letter reflecting this decision as described in paragraph 8 of the sworn Declaration of Alan M. Dershowitz. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Document Request because it misstates paragraph 8 of the sworn Declaration of Alan M. Dershowitz, which expressly states that “on information and belief, the State Attorney in Palm Beach County dropped a case that she sought to bring based on an assessment by the investigating detective regarding the ‘victim’s lack of credibility.’ A copy of the letter reflecting this decision was forwarded to central records.” (Emphasis added). Subject to and without waiving the foregoing specific objections and the General Objections, Defendant responds that he will produce all responsive, non-privileged documents currently in his possession, custody or control.

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM
Wire Refreference
Wire Refreflected
Wire Refreflecting

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.