Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-22608House OversightOther

Incoherent Senate Hearing Transcript with No Substantive Leads

The passage consists of nonsensical dialogue and vague references without any concrete names, transactions, dates, or actionable information linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no investi Contains random mentions of a judge, senators, and Anita Hill but no factual claims. No specific allegations, financial flows, or foreign connections are presented.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015134
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage consists of nonsensical dialogue and vague references without any concrete names, transactions, dates, or actionable information linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no investi Contains random mentions of a judge, senators, and Anita Hill but no factual claims. No specific allegations, financial flows, or foreign connections are presented.

Tags

anecdotalhouse-oversightsenatehearing

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
sensual. Then bumping and grinding away, accompanied by passionate moans and wild braying. You’ ve never seen a sight like this, | promise. And then the camera panned slowly toward the audience . . . and the audience consisted entirely of donkeys.” The Senate office shook with raucous laughter, especially that of Judge Thomas. His booming guffaws rang like huge gongs in a church belfry. And, | must admit, | had to suppress my own laughter. | had been totally caught by surprise, but | appreciated getting the insight. Homo sapiens is, in reality, the only species that has a need for pornography. When the group’ s laughter finally began to simmer down, Senator Hatch said, “Il suppose that movie was one of the demands of the animal rights people.” “That’ s correct,” Senator Simpson added. “Saving animals’ lives is no longer enough. They need cu/ture." | felt like | was imprisoned in the boys’ locker room, but | was getting ready to force myself to leave anyway, and it would have ended right there for me if the subject matter hadn’ t returned to Anita Hill. “I’ m glad nobody considered calling Aer to testify against me, even for a closed-door session,” Judge Thomas said. “But you fellas will really love this. Anita Hill was a very opinionated young lady. Actually, she

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.