Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-23300House OversightOther

Mao’s 1964 Claim on Siberian Territory Cited in Historical Publication

The passage merely repeats a historical statement by Mao about past Chinese claims to Siberian regions, citing a 1964 publication. It provides no new evidence, specific actors, financial flows, or act Mao asserted that parts of Siberia and the Far East historically belonged to China. The claim is sourced from a 1964 Novosti Press Agency publication. The passage includes unrelated modern articles a

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #029428
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage merely repeats a historical statement by Mao about past Chinese claims to Siberian regions, citing a 1964 publication. It provides no new evidence, specific actors, financial flows, or act Mao asserted that parts of Siberia and the Far East historically belonged to China. The claim is sourced from a 1964 Novosti Press Agency publication. The passage includes unrelated modern articles a

Tags

territorial-disputeshistorical-claimsmao-zedonghistorical-narrativehouse-oversightchina-russia-relations

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
ii On 2 September 1964 during Mao’s talk with the Japanese group of socialists, Mao announced that much of Siberia and Far East once belonged to China: “About a hundred years ago the area of to the east of Baikal become the territory of Russia and from then on Vladivostok, Khabarovsk, Kamchatka and other points are the territory of the Soviet Union. We have not yet requested settling this account!” The publisher of the article writes that Mao makes this claim based on “the fact that many hundreds of years ago Chinese troops came to these areas and that once the Chinese Emperor collected tribute from the local people. Sournce: “In connection with Mao Tse-tung’s talk with a group of Japanese socialists”, Novosti Press Agency Publishing House, 2 September 1964, page 9 and 20, https: //ia801207.us.archive.org/0/items/MaosTalkWithJapaneseSocialists/Maos%20Talk%20with%20Japa nese%20Socialists.pdf. Barents Sea ats os t —_ ( 4 a se nf® * RUSSIA RY ky ~~ ra Ps wn Pacific Ocean S, -% ALS “Battered Mongolia faces make-or-break moment” by Ken Koyanagi, Financial Times, 5 February 2017, https: //www.ft.com/content/36b059b4-ea10-11e6-893c-082c54a7f539. v “China- Mongolia Relations: Challenges and Opportunities” by Zolzaya Erdenebileg, China Briefing, 6 January : chi iefing. hi lia-relations.html. “% Throughout history, Han Chinese have only controlled Mongolia for less than 18 months and that military effort was, ironically, financed by the Imperial Japanese Army. vi “Inner Mongolia has become China’s model of assimilation” by Hohhot and West Ujimqin, The Economist, 1 June 2017, http://www.economist.com/news/china/21722853-chinese-mongolians-are-still-asserting-their- identity-inner-mongolia-has-become-chinas-model.

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainia801207.us.archive.org
Domainwww.ft.com
URLhttp://www.economist.com/news/china/21722853-chinese-mongolians-are-still-asserting-their

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.