Court transcript fragment mentions 'Maxwell's money' in a hearing

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 98 H3vlgiu2 MS. SCHULTZ: So it goes to a material argument that defendants have advanced. THI ira] COURT: So to the extent that becomes an issue, and that's a whole other thing, as to whether she intended th statement, I can see that. Okay. All right. Anything else? MS. SCHULTZ: Yes. I'm just going to say that this is a motion in limine and there are no evidentiary problems with this piece of evidence. This is the defendant herself on camera, this is not hearsay, and there's no Federal Rule of Evidence that should exclude this. THI 1a COURT: Okay. Do you want to add anything? MS. MENNINGER: No, thank you, your Honor. THI Le COURT: Okay. Thank you. What else? MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, we can take up the bifurcation issue that's presented in 662 and 766, and then there was a reply filed last evening. THE: ‘COURT: “Yes. MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I think -- well, I don't think. The law is very clear on this issue in this circuit. There is a -- THI Ed COURT: Well, I think we can shorthand this. MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. THI 1s COURT: Yes, yes. Maxwell's money doesn't come in SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011401