Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-23688House OversightDeposition

Palm Beach Politician Pressured Police Chief to Quash Investigation and Refer Case to FBI

The passage reveals that a prominent Palm Beach politician allegedly attempted to influence a police chief to downplay a criminal case and shift it to the FBI, suggesting possible obstruction of justi Police Chief Reiter testified that a prominent Palm Beach politician urged him to avoid a full inves The politician allegedly framed the victims as ‘not believable’ to diminish the case. Reiter faced

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010525
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals that a prominent Palm Beach politician allegedly attempted to influence a police chief to downplay a criminal case and shift it to the FBI, suggesting possible obstruction of justi Police Chief Reiter testified that a prominent Palm Beach politician urged him to avoid a full inves The politician allegedly framed the victims as ‘not believable’ to diminish the case. Reiter faced

Tags

palm-beachlaw-enforcementpolitical-influencepolitical-interferenceobstruction-of-justicedepositionlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
JaMES PATTERSON “| had people in the community in Palm Beach who either made comments directly to me or to others who relayed them to me that I didn't need to take the tack in the investigation that we did, which is [to] completely investigate it and then refer it tothe FBI after the state case was resolved,” Reiter said in the deposition. “I had one individual who came to see me a couple of times about this.” According to the chief, the individual in question was a prominent Palm Beach politician. “He said this wasn’t necessary; this was a case that was really very minor,” Reiter recalled. “The victims had lifestyles that don’t make them—shouldn’t make them believable to the police department.” “I told him that those kinds of suggestions to me were improper and he should stop,” said Reiter. “That he had taken a couple of steps down the road toward something that could eventually constitute a crime. We talked several times. Early on it didn't end favorably. You know, this is an individual [whom] I had to interact with in my official capacity and in his official capacity as well.” The Palm Beach politician wasn't the only one to pressure the police chief. “I received comments from a variety of different viewpoints. . .in some cases I had people tell me, hey, he's a Palm Beacher, why are you investigating a Palm Beacher?” Reiter would say when deposed. “I had people that said it was an unfa- vorable career move for me to ask the state attorney to remove ~ himself from the case and to refer it to the FBI....1 had plenty of 7 people that told me that that was a mistake.” Reiter didn't back off. To have done so would have been 4 a betrayal—not only of the victims but also of his vocation and the community he had sworn he would serve. 184 2 ar Fit: “My responsibility was to Beach and preserve their con: department for all,” Reiter sai particularly under the crimin the nature of our system, be t But along with handing t attorney, Reiter took another letters—on Palm Beach PD | victims in the case. He delivered the letters by

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.