Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-24410House OversightOther

Proposed Rule Change to Limit Victim Address Disclosure in Federal Plea and Alibi Cases

The document outlines a policy proposal to amend disclosure rules for victim information in criminal proceedings. While it identifies a potential procedural shift, it lacks specific actors, transactio Suggests limiting prosecutors' duty to disclose victim addresses/phone numbers to defendants in alib Proposes that only victim objections be reported to the court during plea negotiations. Cites exis

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017736
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document outlines a policy proposal to amend disclosure rules for victim information in criminal proceedings. While it identifies a potential procedural shift, it lacks specific actors, transactio Suggests limiting prosecutors' duty to disclose victim addresses/phone numbers to defendants in alib Proposes that only victim objections be reported to the court during plea negotiations. Cites exis

Tags

alibi-defenserulemakingplea-bargainingcriminal-procedurelegal-reformprocedural-changehouse-oversightvictim-rights

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Page 22 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *871 must review that [*872] statement. !7? Finally, before an Arizona court accepts a plea, the prosecutor must advise the court that reasonable efforts were made to confer with the victim about the plea and the victim's view regarding it. !74 The rule proposed here is narrower than these state formulations: it requires only that a prosecutor confer with the victim about the plea and inform the court if the victim objects. For many significant categories of federal cases (e.g., typical drug trafficking offenses, felons in possession of a firearm, etc.), there will be no victim, much less a victim objection. In such cases, to require some sort of victim inquiry by the court or victim certification by the prosecutor would unnecessarily waste time. The proposed rule requires only that the prosecutor report a victim's objection - in which case the court will presumably want to more carefully consider whether to accept a plea. Rule 12.1 - Victim Addresses and Phone Numbers Not Disclosed for Alibi Purposes The Proposal: The Government currently must disclose the address and telephone numbers of any witnesses, including the victim, that it plans to use to disprove an alibi. This rule should be changed to protect the victim's privacy, excluding their information from this requirement. (b) Disclosing Government Witnesses. (1) Disclosure. If the defendant serves a Rule 12.1(a)(2) notice [regarding intent to present an alibi defense], an attorney for the government must disclose in writing to the defendant or the defendant's attorney: (A) the name, address, and telephone number of each witness and the address and telephone number of each witness (other than a victim) that the government intends [*873] to rely on to establish the defendant's presence at the scene of the alleged offense; and (B) each government rebuttal witness to the defendant's alibi defense (c) Continuing Duty to Disclose. Both an attorney for the government and the defendant must promptly disclose in writing to the other party the name of each additional witness, and the address and telephone number of each additional witness (other than a victim) if: (1) the disclosing party learns of the witness before or during trial; and (2) the witness should have been disclosed under Rule 12.1(a) or (b) if the disclosing party had known of the witness earlier. In addition, a similar change should be made to Rule 12.3 regarding the addresses and telephone numbers of victims who will be used to disprove a public-authority defense. The Rationale: This proposed change implements the victim's right to be "reasonably protected from the accused." !7> The victim cannot be reasonably protected if the defendant, without good reason, is given the victim's address and telephone number. The proposed rule strikes the current requirement that the prosecutor must automatically give the defendant the victim's address and telephone '73 See id. 4 Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. 13-4423(b)(1) (2001). 115 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(a)(1) (West 2004 & Supp. 2005). DAVID SCHOEN

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein

From: To: Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:09:33 +0000 Attachments: (USANYS)" < Sorry, I mean to send this to you a while ago. More of the same from him. From: Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 2:04 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein It is literally unimaginable. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 22:38 To: Subject: Re: Schoen and Epstein Can you imagine moving forward with that case with David Schoen as the "quarterback" of the defense team? Yikes. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2019, at 9:06 PM, ) < > wrote: I got a hit on this as an end-of-year thing from my google alert on Epstein - I had not realized that he did a huge, crazy, absurdly self-aggrandizing interview on this!! https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.comijeffrey-epstein-consulted-atlanta-attomey-days-before-death/ I don't believe a word of his. Just unreal. From: Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 20:00 To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen an

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02541489

4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01763941

9p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Require Victim Input on Nolo Contendere Pleas Cited in CVRA Subcommittee Discussion

The passage outlines a procedural reform suggestion for federal criminal sentencing and notes an apparent oversight by the Advisory Committee. While it mentions Senator Feinstein, it does not provide Advocates amending Rule 11(a)(3) to require courts to consider victims' views before accepting a nol Senator Dianne Feinstein is quoted supporting broader victim rights under the Crime Victims' Right

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02456600

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.