Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-24611House OversightFinancial Record

Court headnotes on antiterrorism and RICO claims related to 9/11 charitable funding allegations

The document merely summarizes legal standards from appellate decisions about what constitutes sufficient pleading under the Antiterrorism Act and RICO. It contains no new factual allegations, names, Clarifies pleading standards for claims that charities funneled money to 9/11 terrorist organization Distinguishes between allegations of knowledge versus mere transfers in antiterrorism lawsuits. No

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017910
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document merely summarizes legal standards from appellate decisions about what constitutes sufficient pleading under the Antiterrorism Act and RICO. It contains no new factual allegations, names, Clarifies pleading standards for claims that charities funneled money to 9/11 terrorist organization Distinguishes between allegations of knowledge versus mere transfers in antiterrorism lawsuits. No

Tags

ricoantiterrorism-actfinancial-flowcharitable-funding911-litigationlegal-standardslegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 [32] [33] [34] involved in those attacks. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2339A(b). Cases that cite this headnote War and National Emergency @ Private Remedies Allegation that defendant funneled money to terrorist organization responsible for September 11th attacks, through charities in which he was involved, was sufficient to state a claim under Antiterrorism Act (ATA), in action alleging provision of support for those attacks. 18 ULS.C.A. § 2339(A). Cases that cite this headnote Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Association with or participation in enterprise; control or intent Complaint which failed to allege that defendant had any role in directing an enterprise thus failed to state a claim under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), for purposes of action alleging provision of support for terrorist organization responsible for September 11th attacks. 18 US.C.A. § 1961 et seq. Cases that cite this headnote War and National Emergency @ Private Remedies Absent any allegation that purported charitable organization knew that the money it was transferring between two other organizations would somehow assist terrorist organization responsible for the September 11th attacks, or that it knew that other organizations to which it transferred money were in the business of supporting terrorism, allegation that WESTLAW [35] [36] [37] organization made such transfers failed to state a claim under Antiterrorism Act (ATA), for purposes of action alleging provision of support for those attacks. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2339(A). Cases that cite this headnote War and National Emergency Private Remedies Allegations that defendant was a founder and leader of terrorist organization responsible for the September 11th attacks, that he had been designated a terrorist by the U.S. government, and that he was the head of various non-government organizations providing financial and logistical support to the terrorist network, sufficiently stated a claim under Antiterrorism Act (ATA), for purposes of action alleging provision of support for terrorists involved in those attacks. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2339(A). Cases that cite this headnote War and National Emergency Private Remedies Allegation that purported Islamic _ relief organization collected and laundered money for terrorist organization responsible for the September 11th attacks, was involved in numerous attacks and plots, and funded the Taliban and terrorist training camps in Afghanistan sufficiently stated a claim under Antiterrorism Act (ATA), for purposes of action alleging provision of support for terrorists involved in those attacks. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2339(A). Cases that cite this headnote Federal Civil Procedure Time of determination; reserving decision

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.