Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-24959House OversightOther

Witness questioned about alleged international trafficking scheme involving multiple minors

The excerpt provides a vague reference to a criminal conspiracy and trafficking of minors but lacks any specific names, dates, financial details, or links to powerful officials. It offers minimal acti Witness acknowledges a 'common scheme' involving multiple girls. Reference to Exhibit 2 and a motion to join related to the allegations. Discussion occurs in a House oversight context (implied by doc

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021919
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The excerpt provides a vague reference to a criminal conspiracy and trafficking of minors but lacks any specific names, dates, financial details, or links to powerful officials. It offers minimal acti Witness acknowledges a 'common scheme' involving multiple girls. Reference to Exhibit 2 and a motion to join related to the allegations. Discussion occurs in a House oversight context (implied by doc

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

minor-exploitationhuman-traffickingwitness-testimonylegal-exposurehouse-oversightcriminal-conspiracy

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 96 Q. All right. Let me just clarify one point before you do that? A. Yes, sir. Q. In your answer, were you referring to the evidence you could recall or the information you could recall that supported your allegations as to both [REDACTED] and other minors or were you treating those separately? A. No, I was not treating those separately. I was -- for me, there's a common -- what the law refers to as a common scheme or plan in a criminal conspiracy for international trafficking that involved not just a single girl, but multiple girls, so the answer was -- was with respect to multiple girls. Q. Okay. So I may have some questions to distinguish further between those two -- A. Yes. Q. -- but is it fair to say that -- and I realize you're going refresh your recollection, but that you had exhausted your recollection of the basis for the allegation in this Exhibit 2, the motion to join as to both Miss Roberts and other minors? A. Yes. Q. Okay. So then now take a look at that and tell me if there's anything there that refreshes your ROUGH DRAFT ONLY

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferring
Wire Refrefreshes

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.