Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-24969House OversightOther

Allegations of CIA Involvement in Suppressing Kennedy Assassination Details

The passage suggests a possible CIA operative supplied excerpts to a critic to discredit dissent on the Kennedy assassination, linking a major intelligence agency to manipulation of historical narrati Reference to a CIA operative allegedly providing excerpts to a critic of the Warren Commission. Mention of Ray Marcus, a known Warren Commission critic, identifying a chronological flaw. Implication

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015087
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage suggests a possible CIA operative supplied excerpts to a critic to discredit dissent on the Kennedy assassination, linking a major intelligence agency to manipulation of historical narrati Reference to a CIA operative allegedly providing excerpts to a critic of the Warren Commission. Mention of Ray Marcus, a known Warren Commission critic, identifying a chronological flaw. Implication

Tags

intelligence-misconductconspiracy-theoryhistorical-suppressionforeign-influenceintelligence-agency-misconducthistorical-manipulationmoderate-importancehouse-oversightciakennedy-assassination

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
in front of him, the first thing Johnson would do now is kill him.” She smiled sardonically, adding, “Unless Bobby beat him to it.” Postscript: The most significant thing about “The Parts Left Out of the Kennedy Book” was its widespread acceptance--if only for a moment--by intelligent, literate people, from an ACLU official to a Peabody Award- winning journalist to members of the intelligence community who knew that sort of thing actually does go on. Daniel Ellsberg said, “Maybe it was just because | wanted to believe it so badly.” One caller claimed that he could determine, by feeding the article into a computer, whether Manchester had written the portions | published. Several individuals queried that final arbiter of truth, the Playboy Adviser. One reader “went out and bought the original Death of a President just to see if your parts would fit into the book--they did. Amazing!” | also received a call from Ray Marcus, a critic of the Warren Commission Report, who had discovered a chronological flaw in my article. How could William Manchester leave something out of his book that was itself a report of something that he’ d left out of his book? Marcus deduced that 7he Realist must have been given the excerpts by a CIA operative in order to discredit va/id dissent on the assassination.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.