Deposition excerpt showing attorney objections to questions about witness Saige's alleged false statements
The passage provides a narrow view of a courtroom exchange with no named high‑profile officials, financial details, or foreign actors. It suggests a possible dispute over a witness’s testimony but lac Attorney Mr. Tein questions witness Saige about alleged lies to avoid deposition and subpoena. Attorney Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the form of the questions, citing lack of foundation. The wit
Summary
The passage provides a narrow view of a courtroom exchange with no named high‑profile officials, financial details, or foreign actors. It suggests a possible dispute over a witness’s testimony but lac Attorney Mr. Tein questions witness Saige about alleged lies to avoid deposition and subpoena. Attorney Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the form of the questions, citing lack of foundation. The wit
Persons Referenced (2)
“...WwW NY ~0929104. TXT answer the question, because any of those conversations involve her counsel. MR. TEIN: Certify that. MR. LEOPOLD: Please. BY MR. TEIN: Q. Now, Saige, you lied to get out of this depos...”
Mr. Leopold“...swer the question, because any of those conversations involve her counsel. MR. TEIN: Certify that. MR. LEOPOLD: Please. BY MR. TEIN: Q. Now, Saige, you lied to get out of this deposition, didn't you? 54 A....”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
House Oversight hearing excerpt reveals possible undisclosed cell phone evidence and questions about financial ties to Jeffrey Epstein
The passage hints that a cell phone, potentially containing incriminating data, was handed to Michelle Pagan and not returned, and raises the question of how much money a witness hopes to receive from Witness gave a cell phone to Michelle Pagan several years ago and has not recovered it. The cell phone could contain communications relevant to ongoing investigations. The line of questioning probes
Incoherent Deposition Transcript with Casual Text Message Reference
The excerpt contains fragmented dialogue from a deposition and a personal text message with no clear connection to any influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct. It lacks specific name Deposition includes vague references to a serious testimony but no substantive content. A casual text message mentions MySpace and personal affection, unrelated to any official matter. No high‑profil
Transcript excerpt from House Oversight deposition showing heated exchange over exhibit handling
The passage records a minor procedural dispute in a deposition with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers little investigative value beyond confirming normal courtroom Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of misrepresenting the record. Dispute over labeling and copying of exhibits. Witness expresses willingness to disagree professionally.
Deposition excerpt shows heated exchange among attorneys with no substantive allegations
The passage is a routine courtroom deposition transcript featuring lawyers arguing over procedure. It contains no names of influential actors, no financial or misconduct details, and offers no actiona The excerpt records a dispute between attorneys (Mr. Tein, Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Leopold) about taking No mention of any high‑profile individuals, agencies, or controversial actions. The content is pro
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40
Testimony on alleged underage relationship involving Palm Beach firefighter Brett
The passage provides a vague courtroom exchange about a possible underage sexual relationship involving a local firefighter. It lacks concrete names beyond the firefighter, no financial or political c Witness questioned about a 22‑year‑old Palm Beach firefighter named Brett dating an underage girl. Questions focus on whether the fire department or police were aware of the relationship. No specific
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.