Non‑public non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) signed by Jeffrey Epstein in 2007, allegedly shielding him from prosecution and limiting victim civil ac...
The passage describes a secret non‑prosecution agreement that appears to have been negotiated by high‑profile prosecutors (including a U.S. Attorney) to protect Jeffrey Epstein from a 57‑count indictm Epstein signed a secret NPA on September 24, 2007, avoiding a 57‑count indictment. The agreement was drafted by the U.S. Attorney's Office and included immunity provisions for Epstein Victims were no
Summary
The passage describes a secret non‑prosecution agreement that appears to have been negotiated by high‑profile prosecutors (including a U.S. Attorney) to protect Jeffrey Epstein from a 57‑count indictm Epstein signed a secret NPA on September 24, 2007, avoiding a 57‑count indictment. The agreement was drafted by the U.S. Attorney's Office and included immunity provisions for Epstein Victims were no
Persons Referenced (5)
“...they'd covered the bases, Roy Black—the lawyer who'd of rape and kept Rush Limbaugh il drug use—and Jay Lefkowitz, _with US attorney R. Alexander 5 attorney’s office reached a for- team: the United States would...”
Roy Black“...side of the political aisle. He nton’s nemesis, Ken Starr, work- ke sure they'd covered the bases, Roy Black—the lawyer who'd of rape and kept Rush Limbaugh il drug use—and Jay Lefkowitz, _with US attorney R....”
Jeffrey Epstein“...t or any compulsory process commanding the disclosure of the agree- ment, it will provide notice to Epstein before making that disclosure.” Remarkably, despite assurances they'd received from the feds, none...”
Kenneth Starr“‘TERSON that side of the political aisle. He nton’s nemesis, Ken Starr, work- ke sure they'd covered the bases, Roy Black—the lawyer who'd of rape and kept Rush Limbaugh...”
Sarah Kellen“...s of i ates also agrees that it will not © against any potential co-conspita | t stated, mentioning Sarah Kellen le. Fittuy Ricw The parties anticipate that this agreement will not be made part of any public r...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48
NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct
The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C
Olt LexisNexis°
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48
Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires
The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-0 I 1789 EFTA00192835 Memorandum Subjeci Operation Leap Year: Notification of Breach USAO No. 2006R0 181 June 9, 2009 To Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney Robert K. Senior First Assistant U.S. Attorney Rolando Garcia Deputy Chief, Criminal Division, West Palm Beach Karen Atkinson, Chief Chief, Criminal Section I, Northern Division, WPB From A. Marie Villafan AUSA, Ft Laude INTRODUCTION. This memorandum seeks approval to serve the attached letter providing notice of a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement on attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. On Friday, June 12, 2009, Judge Marra will be presiding ova a hearing on Jeffrey Epstein's motions to stay all of the civil lawsuits filed against him by victims identified through our investigation. In his Order setting the matter for a hearing, Judge Marra stated: This hearing shall be limited to the issue of whether Defendant Epstein's defense of the civil actions filed against h
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.