Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-25303House OversightOther

J.P. Morgan Global Asset Allocation Note (Nov 9, 2012) on US Election Impact

The document is a routine investment outlook discussing asset allocation after the 2012 US election. It contains no specific allegations, financial flows, or links to influential actors beyond generic J.P. Morgan maintains overweight stance on equities and credit despite election outcome. The note underweights US equities, shifting focus to EM Asia and European credit. Mentions fiscal cliff negoti

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #026572
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a routine investment outlook discussing asset allocation after the 2012 US election. It contains no specific allegations, financial flows, or links to influential actors beyond generic J.P. Morgan maintains overweight stance on equities and credit despite election outcome. The note underweights US equities, shifting focus to EM Asia and European credit. Mentions fiscal cliff negoti

Tags

asset-allocationmarket-outlookus-electionjp-morganhouse-oversightfinance

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Global Asset Allocation 09 November 2012 J.P Morgan The J.P. Morgan View Do US elections change anything? Asset allocation — The equity market has priced out the Romney win scenario, but from these levels, our economic and market outlook and risks are unchanged. These keep us medium-term overweight equities and credit, despite the likely volatility as the fiscal cliff is negotiated. Within equities, we stay underweight the US, and move most of the overweight into EM Asia. We have moved some of our credit overweight from the US to Europe. Economics — The data flows continue to confirm that June/July was likely the bottom in global activity growth, and that we are gently lifting from those levels, even as it will take well into next year before growth returns to trend. Fixed Income — Look for yields to head higher, but focus more risk on spread compression trades. Equities — We focus our overweights on EM Asia, Cyclical stocks and US Home builders. Credit — We see the current dip as an opportunity to add risk. Currencies — Be long the dollar during the fiscal cliff negotiations. Commodities — A further set of better Chinese economic data keeps us long base metals. Equity markets are taking the Obama victory quite badly, with US stocks down some 4% on Wednesday and Thursday. This has pushed up global bond markets, and credit spreads are wider, but commodities are largely ignoring this turmoil. We don’t think an Obama victory truly changes the economic outlook, or risks, but it does eliminate the Romney hope that appeared to have been in market pricing. By definition, the Romney scenario is now priced out of the market. The US elections confirm the status quo in Washington, and to us, they do so also for period a relative financial “peace”. The US, in contrast, is at the start of intense negotiations on how to avoid a fiscal-cliff induced recession next year. Neither side of the aisle has an interest in being blamed for a recession. But markets will still be buffeted by a steady news flow on wide gaps between each side’s position. the broad economic and market outlook, from current levels. Hence, we do not EMBIG see much reason to change our investment allocations, and remain medium-term EM $ Corp. |! overweight both credit and equities against cash, government debt, and US High Yield commodities. We do so on the basis of value — still high risk premia — fading MSCI Europe* risks on fiscal policy in the US into next year; an expected rebound in global S&P500 growth; and super easy monetary policy, with more QE coming if growth were MSCI EM* to disappoint. MSCI AC Word | In recent weeks, we have switched out of our long-standing US risk overweight, US High Grade | into an underweight, on the argument that the US had the most committed Europe Fixed Inc* | central banker, its growth has been least disappointing, and its fiscal risks were Gold | further into the future. This relative risk has changed, with Chinese economic EM Local Bonds** data confirming that its economy is rebounding, while the ECB now creating a EM EX H | See page 7 for analyst certification and important disclosures. Global Asset Allocation Jan Loeys AC (1-212) 834-5874 jan.loeys@jpmorgan.com JPMorgan Chase Bank NA John Normand (44-20) 7134-1816 john.normand@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities ple Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou (44-20) 7134-7815 nikolaos.panigirtzoglou@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities ple Seamus Mac Gorain (44-20) 7134-7761 seamus.macgorain@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities ple Matthew Lehmann (44-20) 7134-7813 matthew.m.lehmann@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities ple Leo Evans (44-20) 7742-2537 leonard.a.evans@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities ple YTD returns through Nov 8 %, equities are in lighter color. US Fixed Income Global Gov Bonds** Topix* US cash GSCI TR 5 0 T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 5 10 15 20 Source: J.P. Morgan, Bloomberg. See blue box on page 2 for description. www.morganmarkets.com

Technical Artifacts (9)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.morganmarkets.com
Emailjan.loeys@jpmorgan.com
Emailjohn.normand@jpmorgan.com
Emailleonard.a.evans@jpmorgan.com
Emailmatthew.m.lehmann@jpmorgan.com
Emailnikolaos.panigirtzoglou@jpmorgan.com
Emailseamus.macgorain@jpmorgan.com
Phone1-212) 834-5874
Phone742-2537

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.