Alison's 2005 testimony implicates Jeffrey Epstein in repeated sexual abuse of a minor Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

Case File

d-25603House OversightOther

Voluntary Dismissal Filing in Doe v. Trump (1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA)

The email documents a routine voluntary dismissal of a case against Donald Trump and others, providing no new factual allegations, financial details, or evidence of wrongdoing. It merely confirms that Case was filed in the Southern District of New York under number 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA. Plaintiff listed as Jane Doe, indicating a possibly anonymous or protected claimant. The filing was entered by attor

Date

November 11, 2025

Source

House Oversight

Reference

House Oversight #032334

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

Persons Referenced (2)

Kathryn Ruemmler

“From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: 11/5/2016 11:56:17 AM To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: told you Importan...”

Donald Trump

“...4, 2016 5:59 PM To: CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.gov Subject: Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF sy...”

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: 11/5/2016 11:56:17 AM To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: told you Importance: — High Sent from my iPad On Nov 4, 2016, at 6:17 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: From: NYSD ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov [mailto:NYSD ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov] Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 5:59 PM To: CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.gov Subject: Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. *** NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on 11/4/2016 Case Name: Doe v. Trump et al Case Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA Filer: Jane Doe Document Number: 15 Docket Text: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above- captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas) 1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:16-CV-07673-RA

Emailcourtmail@nysd.uscourts.gov

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com

Emailpool@nysd.uscourts.gov

Wire Refreferenced

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Michael Wolff emails Jeffrey Epstein seeking introductions to Tom Barrack and Kathy Ruemmler for Trump book

Michael Wolff emails Jeffrey Epstein seeking introductions to Tom Barrack and Kathy Ruemmler for Trump book The email provides a concrete request linking a prominent journalist (Michael Wolff) to Jeffrey Epstein for introductions to a major real‑estate financier (Tom Barrack) and a senior White House official (Kathy Ruemmler) in the context of a Trump‑related book. It suggests a possible conduit for Epstein to influence or gain access to Trump‑era insiders, which is a useful investigative lead, though the claim is limited to a single request and lacks corroborating details. Key insights: Wolff is writing a book about Donald Trump for a large payment.; He asks Epstein to introduce him to Tom Barrack, a known Trump ally and financier.; He also requests a re‑introduction to Kathy Ruemmler, former White House counsel.

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02661322

House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Personal email exchange between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. with trivial remarks

The content consists of casual, non‑business conversation with no mention of financial transactions, wrongdoing, or high‑level officials. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Exchange appears to be personal, arranging a meeting in New York. Contains a vague, unrelated comment about Donald Trump. Repeated legal disclaimer about confidentiality and privilege.

House OversightUnknown

Personal email exchange with no substantive political or financial content

Personal email exchange with no substantive political or financial content The passage consists of casual, personal messages about travel plans and a vague comment about a public figure. It contains no actionable leads, specific transactions, dates of relevance, or allegations involving powerful actors. Therefore it offers no investigative value. Key insights: Exchange between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. about meeting in New York.; A non‑specific remark about Donald Trump as "living proof" of a saying.

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

ABC News reporter seeks off‑record interview about Jeffrey Epstein ties to former President Clinton and Donald Trump

The passage merely shows a journalist requesting a meeting to discuss publicly known allegations linking Epstein to Clinton and Trump. It contains no new facts, names, dates, transactions, or actionab Email chain includes a request from an ABC News investigative reporter to speak with Martin G. Weinb The communication is marked privileged and confidential, but no substantive information is disclos

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

It's an absurdly vast house, among the largest in Manhattan, but the

20p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.