Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-25740House OversightOther

Alleged overheard conversation about Anita Hill allegations involving Clarence Thomas, Orrin Hatch, and Alan Simpson

The passage offers a vague claim of an informal conversation among high‑profile officials regarding the Anita Hill accusations. It provides no concrete details, dates beyond the known confirmation tim Author claims to have heard a private discussion on Oct. 5, 1991 Participants allegedly included Justice Clarence Thomas, Sen. Orrin Hatch, and Sen. Alan Simpson Conversation purportedly concerned An

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015132
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage offers a vague claim of an informal conversation among high‑profile officials regarding the Anita Hill accusations. It provides no concrete details, dates beyond the known confirmation tim Author claims to have heard a private discussion on Oct. 5, 1991 Participants allegedly included Justice Clarence Thomas, Sen. Orrin Hatch, and Sen. Alan Simpson Conversation purportedly concerned An

Tags

political-oversightsexual-harassmentpotential-misconductpolitical-influencejudiciaryconfirmation-hearingshouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit | shall identify myself only as a female aide to a Republican senator. It is also relevant that | have long nurtured a keen interest in psycho- history, the process by which a nation’ s direction is interpreted as an extension of the psychological makeup of those individuals who govern it. Without going into specific detail, let me simply state that on October 5, 1991, | happened to hear part of a conversation among Judge—now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Senator Alan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then 13-1, to recommend the confirmation of Judge Thomas, and one day after the full Senate indicated that he wou/d be confirmed. The conversation | happened to hear had to do with those charges brought by Anita Hill and ignored by the members of the committee, both Democratic and Republican. At that point in time | still thought this was an appropriate response, because the alternative would have been to hold an executive session, and Judge Thomas would then have had no practical choice but to resort to heavy denial. Now, however, these men were, in a

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.