Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-26144House OversightOther

Philosophical discourse on mathematics, geometry, and cognition with no actionable leads

The passage consists of abstract reflections on mathematical theory and philosophy, mentioning no concrete individuals, transactions, or allegations. It provides no investigative leads, novel claims, Discusses Dennis Sullivan's presentation of the Mandelbrot set. References historical shifts from Euclidean to non‑Euclidean geometry. Quotes René Thom on abstract physicalist truth and cognition.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013679
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage consists of abstract reflections on mathematical theory and philosophy, mentioning no concrete individuals, transactions, or allegations. It provides no investigative leads, novel claims, Discusses Dennis Sullivan's presentation of the Mandelbrot set. References historical shifts from Euclidean to non‑Euclidean geometry. Quotes René Thom on abstract physicalist truth and cognition.

Tags

mathematicshouse-oversightphilosophyhistory-of-science

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
operations resulting in the surety of proofs. The unresolved tension about what | believed from intuitive experience and what | was allowed to believe from the logic of theorem and proof, perhaps not unlike my belief in the transcendent experience over logical theological argument as Reality, continued throughout my life. For example, many decades later at HES, | saw the world class dynamical systems theorist and differential geometer-topologist, Dennis Sullivan, use a projector to display a computer-generated, intricate and beautiful, mathematical object, the well known, computer screen saver, Mandelbrot set. It represents the control parameter plane of the well studied complex analytic map, z > z* + c. Sullivan, pointing to a small, discrete complicated little part of it that looked like a little version of the whole of it, from a distance looking like a point, said, “An important Ph.D. dissertation is waiting to be done on the question: is this (pointing to the little object) really there?” In the audience of about a hundred professional mathematicians and one amateur, | was the only one that laughed. Historians of mathematics point to the successful generalization of Euclidian geometry via its abstract axioms, postulates and logical operations to a new, not naturally intuitable, almost nonvisualizable, non-Euclidean geometry (with the new geometric axiom, parallel lines do meet at infinity), as evidence against the Kantian idea of the intuitively accessible, a priori status of geometry. This served as an example of where mathematics naturally resides, and argues in favor of the thought control imposed by the modern set theoretic and logical rituals of mathematical theorem and proof. Thom, in a_hereditary-evolutionary biological argument developed in Semiophysics, said “Objections raised to the Kantian apriority of Euclidean geometry after the discovery of non-Euclidean geometries, and the theories of twentieth century physics (restricted and general relativity, quantum mechanics) appear to me to be irrelevant...they deal with ...the infinitely small and infinitely large...which lies outside the usual cognitive activity of ancient man.” In my discussions with him, Thom found equivalence relations between mental and real world objects and their behaviors. He described what he called an abstract physicalist truth that describes a psychic universe, which, in turn, simulates outside things and processes. Much like the transcendent experiential God | have 179

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.