Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-26164House OversightOther

Court filing on 9/11 terrorist attack lawsuits contains heavily redacted/garbled text

The document is a docket entry with nonsensical filler text and no identifiable actors, transactions, or specific allegations that could be pursued. It offers no concrete leads, novel information, or Appears to be a procedural filing concerning alleged ATS violations and dismissal of claims. References generic categories such as "Defendants", "Sovereign Defendants", and "NCB" without naming Cites

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #023365
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a docket entry with nonsensical filler text and no identifiable actors, transactions, or specific allegations that could be pursued. It offers no concrete leads, novel information, or Appears to be a procedural filing concerning alleged ATS violations and dismissal of claims. References generic categories such as "Defendants", "Sovereign Defendants", and "NCB" without naming Cites

Tags

court-filing911-litigationproceduralhouse-oversightlegal-docket

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) “ji A. OPlaintiffs Alleged That Defendants Violated the ATS By Intentionally Facilitating 123 International Terrorist ......cecsescssssssseessseeessneeecsneeessneesssneesesnsesssnsesesnsesssnsesssnsescsnsecsussecesseesssseccaneensaueersnneersnseersneeraneetansestay B. Acts of International Terrorism are a Violation of Customary International Law 0.00... ices 123 1. United Nations Security Council resolutions: ..eccccccccsscecsescessseecseescesssneesneeccseeeseeesesecaseeeseesneecaseseueereneeeateeeatersneess 125 2. International CONVENLIONS .eeccsscsssesssesssessseesssnsesssnsesssnsesssnsestsnsesssnsesssnecsueeeccuseecssseessueccaneensaueersnneersneeranestaneeeaneettay 126 3. Domestic Laws Of NALIONS ecceecsssccsesescsssseesseecsessseeseeeceseceseesnsecasecessesnecssseceseecsnessnsecaseceusersnsccaseccatersnessuseceaeeraersneecaseceasss 128 4. Congress and federal COUPES ecccccesccssssecseeceesscseeesneeceseccseeeseceeseceaseesnesesecestesseeesnsecaseseaseesnsecaseecaersneeeaseceneeseneesnseseds 129 C. International Terrorism Is Sufficiently Definite and of Mutual Concern to States ......ceccseceeneeneeees 132 II. The District Court Improperly Dismissed the Torture Victim Protection Act Claims 0.0... cess 135 IV. The District Court Improperly Dismissed the Negligence And Intentional Tort Claims «0... ee 139 A. The District Court Wrongly Dismissed the Negligence Claims oo... ececccesssecsseessessseeeseeeceeessseereneecnteseatersneess 140 B. The District Court Wrongly Dismissed the Intentional Tort Clatims 2... ececccsesssecseesseeseseeeeeeeceeeesseeesneeeetenseess 145 1. Plaintiffs’ Claims Are Not Time-Barred ..cecccccssssssssssseecsessseesssneeceteceseeesneesnsecesesssneesnsecaseseseesneeaseseaeereneeenteseatersneest 145 1. Plaintiffs Pleaded That Defendants Materially Supported a1-Qa0@dQ ...sccscsscseseeesssesseereseeceeesceeeeneeceteceeeneeees 148 2. Defendants Who Supported al-Qaeda Through Its Network Are Liable ..ccecccscccsseseseeeeeeceeseeeeneneeceeeneee 149 V. The Court Should Reverse The Dismissals Of NCB and the Sovereign Defendants Based Upon Doe 151 Ve BEM LQM@N vessssessssesssssessseessseesssecsnseecsnseensnseensnseesanseessnestsnsesesnsesssnsestansesesnsessunsesssnseceueeessuseessunessasessaueesaneersnseeraneeraneetanestan A. The Sovereign Defendants And NCB Were Dismissed Under Terrorist Attacks TID... 152 B. Doe Overruled Terrorist Attacks TID iecssscssssssssssssssessseessssesssnsesssnesssnsessseeecssseesssseessseccaseessaseeesneessneeranseeraneestanestan 154 *iv C. The Court Should Reverse the Dismissals of the Sovereign Defendants and NCB and Remand 155 For Jurisdictional Discovery ......cccsssssssssseessseessseseseesnsecesescseeesnsecaseceusessnecsnsecaseecsneesnsecaseseasessnsecaseseaecsneesnsecaaeeeasersneeeaseceasss COMCTUSION ose eesssesesssesssseessseessseesnseecsnseersnseecsnseessnseetsnsesssnsesesnsesssnsesesnseseunsecssnsesssnseseuteccessessseessansessuuetsnseersnseetanseessneetanseetanses 156 Certificate Of Compliance Pursuant to FRAP 32(a)(7)(A) -.sscscssesscssssseesnteccseseseeesnseceseceaseesnsecusecesseesneesnseceateseneesnseseds 160 *y TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc., 130 S. Ct. 3541 (2010) oes 124 Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc., 562 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2009) oes 124, 136, 137 Abecassis v. Wyatt, 785 F. Supp. 2d 614 (S.D. Tex. 2011) ...... 68, 71, 101, 118 WESTLAW

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.