Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-26345House OversightOther

Allegations of Obama Administration Suppressing and Distributing Intelligence on Trump‑Russia Contacts

The passage suggests that senior Obama officials (e.g., Susan Rice) allegedly compiled spreadsheets of Trump associates’ Russian contacts and that intelligence agencies distributed this material acros U.S. intelligence allegedly intercepted Kremlin officials discussing contacts with Trump associates. Trump publicly claimed the Obama administration fabricated Russian interference intelligence. Rumo

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #019998
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage suggests that senior Obama officials (e.g., Susan Rice) allegedly compiled spreadsheets of Trump associates’ Russian contacts and that intelligence agencies distributed this material acros U.S. intelligence allegedly intercepted Kremlin officials discussing contacts with Trump associates. Trump publicly claimed the Obama administration fabricated Russian interference intelligence. Rumo

Tags

russiaintelligence-manipulationforeign-influenceintelligence-communitypolitical-interferencepolitical-sabotagetrump-campaignleakslegal-exposurehouse-oversightobama-administration

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
And: Separately, American intelligence agencies had intercepted communications of Russian officials, some of them within the Kremlin, discussing contacts with Trump associates. The story went on: Mr. Trump has denied that his campaign had any contact with Russian officials, and at one point he openly suggested that American spy agencies had cooked up intelligence suggesting that the Russian government had tried to meddle in the presidential election. Mr. Trump has accused the Obama administration of hyping the Russia story line as a way to discredit his new administration. And then the real point: At the Obama White House, Mr. Trump’s statements stoked fears among some that intelligence could be covered up or destroyed—or its sources exposed—once power changed hands. What followed was a push to preserve the intelligence that underscored the deep anxiety with which the White House and American intelligence agencies had come to view the threat from Moscow. Here was more confirmation of a central Trump thesis: The previous administration, its own candidate defeated, was not just disregarding the democratic custom of smoothing the way for the winner of the election; rather, in the Trump White House view, Obama’s people had plotted with the intelligence community to put land mines in the new administration’s way. Secret intelligence was, the story suggested, being widely distributed across intelligence agencies so as to make it easier to leak, and at the same time to protect the leakers. This intelligence, it was rumored, consisted of spreadsheets kept by Susan Rice that listed the Trump team’s Russian contacts; borrowing a technique from WikiLeaks, the documents were secreted on a dozen servers in different places. Before this broad distribution, when the information was held tightly, it would have been easy to identify the small pool of leakers. But the Obama administration had significantly expanded that pool. So this was good news, right? Wasn’t this proof, the president asked, that Obama and his people were out to get him? The 7imes story was a leak about a plan to leak—and it provided clear evidence of the deep state. Hope Hicks, as always, supported Trump’s view. The crime was leaking and the culprit was the Obama administration. The Justice Department, the president was confident, was now going to investigate the former president and his people. Finally. OOK Ok Hope Hicks also brought to the president a big piece in the New Yorker. The magazine had just published an article by three authors—Evan Osnos, David Remnick, and Joshua Yaffa

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.