Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-26651House OversightOther

PR email denying alleged claims against Ghislaine Maxwell and others

The passage is a generic reputation‑management note containing no specific names, dates, transactions, or evidence. It merely repeats denials of alleged defamatory statements and offers no actionable Email sent from Acuity Reputation on Jan 2, 2015 referencing Ghislaine Maxwell. Claims that allegations by a [REDACTED - Survivor] are false and previously addressed. Mentions a name, Alan Derschowitz, al

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014803
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a generic reputation‑management note containing no specific names, dates, transactions, or evidence. It merely repeats denials of alleged defamatory statements and offers no actionable Email sent from Acuity Reputation on Jan 2, 2015 referencing Ghislaine Maxwell. Claims that allegations by a [REDACTED - Survivor] are false and previously addressed. Mentions a name, Alan Derschowitz, al

Tags

reputation-managementghislaine-maxwelldefamationmedia-claimslegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 751-1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 2 of 2 From: <ross@acuityreputation.com> Date: 2 January 2015 at 20:38 Subject: Ghislaine Maxwell To: Rossacuity Gow <ross@acuityreputation.com> bec: martin.robinson@mailonline.co.uk, P.Peachey@independent.co.uk, nick.sommerlad@mirror.co.uk, david.brown@thetimes.co.uk, nick.alway@bbc.co.uk, jo-anne.pugh@bbc.co.uk To Whom It May Concern, Please find attached a quotable statement on behalf of Ms Maxwell. No further communication will be provided by her on this matter. Thanks for your understanding. Best Ross Ross Gow ACUITY Reputation Jane Doe 3 is [REDACTED] - so not a new individual. The allegations made by Victoria Roberts against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue. The original allegations are not new and have been fully responded to and shown to be untrue. Each time the story is re told it changes with new salacious details about public figures and world leaders and now it is alleged by Ms Roberts that Alan Derschowitz is involved in having sexual relations with her, which he denies. Ms Roberts claims are obvious lies and should be treated as such and not publicised as news, as they are defamatory. Ghislaine Maxwell's original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains the same. Maxwell strongly denies allegations of an unsavoury nature, which have appeared in the British press and elsewhere and reserves her right to seek redress at the repetition of such old defamatory claims. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device GM_00068

Technical Artifacts (8)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:15-CV-07433-RWS
Emaildavid.brown@thetimes.co.uk
Emailjo-anne.pugh@bbc.co.uk
Emailmartin.robinson@mailonline.co.uk
Emailnick.alway@bbc.co.uk
Emailnick.sommerlad@mirror.co.uk
Emailp.peachey@independent.co.uk
Emailross@acuityreputation.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.