Document alleges phone and private‑plane records link Jeffrey Epstein to sexual encounters with underage girls in Palm Beach, supporting probable‑c...
The passage provides concrete investigative leads – subpoenaed private‑plane logs, cell‑phone call logs, and specific dates tying Epstein’s flights to alleged victim contact. It implicates a high‑prof Subpoena obtained Epstein’s 2005 private‑plane records from Jet Aviation showing arrivals/departures Cell‑phone records of a witness (Sarah Kellen) show calls to victims and a person named Dobbs made
Summary
The passage provides concrete investigative leads – subpoenaed private‑plane logs, cell‑phone call logs, and specific dates tying Epstein’s flights to alleged victim contact. It implicates a high‑prof Subpoena obtained Epstein’s 2005 private‑plane records from Jet Aviation showing arrivals/departures Cell‑phone records of a witness (Sarah Kellen) show calls to victims and a person named Dobbs made
Persons Referenced (2)
“...n the days just prior to their arrival or during the time Epstein was in Palm Beach. Therefore, as Jeffrey Epstein, who at the time of these incidents was fifty one years of age, did have vaginal inter- course eit...”
Sarah Kellen“...ane at Palm Beach International airport. These records were com- pared to the cell phone records of Sarah Kellen. This compar- ison found that all the phone calls Kellen made to [Dobbs] and the victims were made...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
EFTA01387839
EFTA01835168
Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM
Telephone message logs: DOJ-OGR-00032705
This document contains logs of telephone messages for various individuals, including Jeff, Mr. Epstein (potentially Jeffrey Epstein), and Sarah, on July 26, 2017. The messages indicate calls, requests to call back, and potential follow-up actions. The document is labeled with a 'Public Records Request No.' suggesting it was obtained through a public records request.
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.