Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-26835House OversightDeposition

Court hearing on admissibility of reports and witness testimony

The excerpt contains only procedural dialogue about evidentiary objections and does not identify any influential actors, specific transactions, or substantive allegations. It offers no actionable lead Discussion of business record exception and residual hearsay. Reference to a witness identified only as "AH". Mention of Ms. Maxwell's state of mind as a potential relevance factor.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011436
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The excerpt contains only procedural dialogue about evidentiary objections and does not identify any influential actors, specific transactions, or substantive allegations. It offers no actionable lead Discussion of business record exception and residual hearsay. Reference to a witness identified only as "AH". Mention of Ms. Maxwell's state of mind as a potential relevance factor.

Tags

court-proceedingswitness-testimonyevidencelegal-exposurehouse-oversighthearsay

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 133 H3vlgiu2 our witness list is AH, who is in the report and she testified in this case. THE COURT: Well, that's a different issue. And you said you're going to present her. MS. McCAWLEY: Yes. = THE COURT: Well, all right. That's a different question. But in other words, you could show her the report and ask her if she's aware of these reports. I assume what her answer is going to be. And that's the end of it. MS. McCAWLEY: Well, your Honor, I mean, obviously we'd like to enter the reports under the business record exception through Recarey and through the residual hearsay -- THE COURT: But even if you do that, I don't see how you avoid eliminating the hearsay. Well, okay. All right. MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, could I have one final comment on this. If they're not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted, they're really not relevant to this case is my final point, because if they're not being offered for the truth of the matter asserted, at best it's a neutral as to whether these things did or didn't happen. If they didn't happen, they would certainly be supportive of Ms. Maxwell's state of mind if she knew about them. If they're not being offered for the truth of the matter -- = THE COURT: Well, it might be material that she knew SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(212) 805-0300

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.