Witness testimony references unnamed law firms and a vague agreement related to [REDACTED - Survivor] and other minors

Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 40 mean -- I guess the attorneys representing Virginia Roberts on various matters which Boies Schiller law firm, the Bradley J. Edwards and his law firm, University of Utah's general counsel's office, the university -- I'm sorry -- the Utah Attorney General's office, Attorney General Reaz * (ph) and other persons there. And the Searcy -- well, Mr. Scarola's law firm, I'm trying to remember -- sorry, Jack, I can't remember the name of all your partners off the top of my head. MR. SCAROLA: That's quite all right. MR. SIMPSON: He's the man. THE WITNESS: It's the law firm that Mr. Scarola is a named partner in. BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. And is it -- am I correct that you cannot say one way or the other whether that written agreement was executed before or after December 30th, 2014? A. That's right. Sitting here right now, no, I can't recall. Q. Okay. I want to go back to the motion for joinder which is Exhibit 2, and the provision -- not the provision -- the assertion that we were referring to. A. Right, right. Q. Concerning not [REDACTED], but other minors. Do you have that in mind? ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021863