Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-27102House OversightDeposition

Deposition excerpt alleges false statements by Alan Dershowitz and links Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein, and Virginia Roberts to an international s...

The passage names several high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, Virginia Roberts) and claims they provided false testimony and concealed travel records related to Alleged false statements by Alan Dershowitz about his travel logs and knowledge of Prince Andrew’s a Reference to a photograph showing Prince Andrew with [REDACTED - Survivor] and a man identified as Glen

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010853
Pages
3
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage names several high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, Virginia Roberts) and claims they provided false testimony and concealed travel records related to Alleged false statements by Alan Dershowitz about his travel logs and knowledge of Prince Andrew’s a Reference to a photograph showing Prince Andrew with [REDACTED - Survivor] and a man identified as Glen

Tags

prince-andrewjeffrey-epsteinsex-traffickingfalse-testimonyvirginia-robertsfinancial-flow-implied-via-fliforeign-influencealan-dershowitzlegal-depositionlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightflight-logssexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
00:48:15 00:48:19 00:48:22 00:48:26 00:48:27 00:48:29 00:48:32 On Oak WD = 00:48:35 © 00:48:38 00:48:42 10 onaaas 14 cosas 12 00:48:52 13 00:48:56 14 00:48:59 15 ooagor 16 00:49:05 17 oo.aa0s 18 oo-as-to 19 oosor2 20 00:49:13 21 0041s 22 onae:20 23 oo-ss23 24 00:49:26 25 00:49:33 00:49:36 00:49:39 00:49:41 00:49:43 00:49:47 00:49:50 On On & WD 00:49:53 © 00:49:56 oososs 10 onso01 14 oosooa 12 ooso07 13 coso10 14 00:50:14 15 ooso17 16 o0s020 17 005022 18 oos0.28 19 ooso28 20 00:50:29 21 oosos1 22 00:50:34 23 00:50:35 24 00:50:39 25 13 of 46 sheets 200 So I thought that was, again, a deliberate faise statement under oath designed to exculpate him from his criminal involvement in this international sex trafficking ring. At another point in the transcript, he was asked, quote, -- no, I'm sorry. He stated, quote: I challenge you to find any statement where I said I have never traveled outside the presence of my wife, close quote, representing that there would be no such statement there, when, in fact, I'm aware of an American Lawyer quotation attributed to him from January 15th, 2015, quote: I've been married to the same woman for 28 years. She goes with me everywhere, close quote. And, again, you know, this -- I understand sometimes people may go away from their wife, but the American Lawyer was, obviously, on January 15th, 2015, asking about: Well, have you been outside the presence of your wife in situations where you might have interacted with Virginia Roberts? And that was the answer that he gave to the American Lawyer. And based on -- on my review of the flight fogs, I thought that was, again, a deliberate effort to obscure and try to exculpate himself from his involvement in this International sex trafficking ring. The -- he also said yesterday: Nobody knows ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 204 about Prince Andrew and Virginia, except for the two of them. And, again, I thought that was at a minimum, deliberately mis -- misleading information and more likely deliberately false information, because Mr. Dershowitz was aware of the photograph and had long been aware of the photograph that shows Prince Andrew with his arm around [REDACTED], standing next to a beaming Glenn Maxwell who has been involved in this international sex trafficking organization. And in the circumstances of that photograph, it seems quite likely that the photographer who took that picture was the head of the international sex trafficking ring, Jeffrey Epstein. And so for him to say that only two people knew what went on was, again, deliberately faise information, because I know he is the attorney for Jeffrey Epstein, and he could have asserted attorney/client privilege over that, said, I can't get into my communications with my client about what he was doing with Prince Andrew. But instead he said, no one knows what happened, other than those two people in circumstances where it was quite clear that there would have been others who would have been aware of that. Now, the question is: Why do I think the -- the -- you know, there are inaccuracies in the flight ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 00:50:41 00:50:45 00:50:49 00:50:51 00:50:54 00:50:58 00:51:04 00:51:03 00:51:04 On AOA WH = 9 oos106 10 oostos 11 os 12 oos114 13 oosi7 14 costa 15 oos122 16 oos125 17 oo51.29 18 oos1:32 19 oosts4 20 oos137 24 oot 22 005142 23 costs 24 005147 25 00:51:50 00:51:52 00:51:54 00:51:55 00:51:57 00:54:59 00:52:03 00:52:03 60:52:05 On Oak Gh = 9 00:52:08 1 0 00:52:10 1 1 00:52:13 1 2 00:52:15 1 3 00:52:18 1 4 00:52:20 1 5 00:52:23 1 6 00:52:25 1 7 00:52:27 1 8 00:52:34 1 9 00:52:34 20 00:52:36 21 00:52:36 22 00:52:36 23 00:52:59 24 00:53:00 25 Page 200 to 203 of 335 202 logs. And I could refresh my recollection here by looking at, I think it's docket entry 291 of our pleading that we presented on January 21st to Judge Marra where we provided specific itemized examples of inconsistencies between the Dave Rogers’ flight log and the -- again, I'll call it, the Alan Dershowitz flight log, which was a selected presentation of flight log information, And when you see those inconsistencies, it becomes very hard to believe that all of the information that was provided in those flight logs was accurate. So when I take all of that information, put it together, I believe that there's sufficient -- I have a sufficient basis for believing at this point in time, that Mr. Dershowitz has, indeed, provided inaccurate information to -- to law enforcement agencies, or at a minimum has provided -- has produced inaccurate information through circumstances beyond his control. But when he continually represents that the information is accurate and exonerates him, I believe that that is a deliberately false statement. MR. SIMPSON: Move to strike the answer -- the nonresponsive portion of the answer. MR. SCAROLA: Which portion is that? MR. SIMPSON: 99 percent of it. I think at ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 203 the end, we got to the flight logs. I move to strike the nonresponsive portion. BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. Mr. Cassell, you came here today looking for an opportunity to give that statement; did you not? A. If it was relevant to an answer I was giving, yes. Q. The answer to my question is, yes, you came here today looking for a question to which you could respond with that prepared statement? A. Iwas prepared to give that -- I anticipated that a very good attorney for Mr. Dershowitz might ask a question where that would be relevant. And if that question were asked and I was given the opportunity to make that statement, I wanted to be prepared to give it in the most accurate way that I could. MR. SIMPSON: I would like the reporter to mark as Exhibit -- are we up to 4 ~- Exhibit 4, the document that Mr. Cassell was referring to. lil fet the reporter do that. THE WITNESS: Okay. (Casseil's 1.D. Exhibit No. 4 - document produced by the witness was marked for identification.) MR. SIMPSON: I just want to make that part of the record. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS (954) 331-4400 10/20/2015 01:08:15 PM

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(954) 331-4400
Wire Refreferring

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

511 922,419 FtIN;Cf

511 922,419 FtIN;Cf f ift - ( df)t— Th-tittsf e: wr iwi mcfn .3:95Kona - apt?? It * ci of * C PRCta MOSPats Details of a civil lawsuit, made public in January 2035, contained a deposition from "Jane Doe 3" that accused Maxwell of recruiting her in 1999, when she was a minor, and grooming her to provide sexual services for Epstein.M A 2018 expose by Julie K. Brown in the M' revealed Jane Doe 3 to be , who was previously known as met Maxwell at Donald 'frump's Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, w en was a 16- year-old spa attendant.M She asserted that Maxwell had introduced her to Epstein, after which she was " omed by. the two [of them] for his pleasure, including lessons in Epstein's preferences during oral sex". 22n631 Maxwell has repeatedly denied any involvement in Epstein's crimes.L2i In a 2015 statement, Maxwell rejected allegations that she has acted as a procurer for Epstein and denied that she had "facilitated Prince Andrew's [alleged] acts of sexual abus

25p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01682184

186p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein’s Elite Network and Unverified Claims of Government ‘Bounty Hunting’

The passage lists numerous high‑profile individuals and institutions linked to Epstein, providing names and affiliations that could be pursued for financial or influence investigations. However, it la Epstein claimed to have worked as a “bounty hunter” recovering money for the government or wealthy c He was a limited partner at Bear Stearns under mentorship of Ace Greenberg and James Cayne. Member

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01404801

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com>

6p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.