Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-27190House OversightOther

Federal Expense Mix Shows Entitlement Spending at 51% of Total in 2005

The passage provides publicly available budget percentages without new allegations, specific individuals, or suspicious financial flows. It offers no actionable investigative leads and repeats known O Entitlement expenses rose from 21% (1965) to 51% (2005). Defense spending fell from 43% to 20% over the same period. Non‑defense discretionary spending decreased slightly to 22% in 2005.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #020957
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides publicly available budget percentages without new allegations, specific individuals, or suspicious financial flows. It offers no actionable investigative leads and repeats known O Entitlement expenses rose from 21% (1965) to 51% (2005). Defense spending fell from 43% to 20% over the same period. Non‑defense discretionary spending decreased slightly to 22% in 2005.

Tags

nondefense-discretionaryfederal-budgetdefense-spendingomb-datahouse-oversightentitlement-spending

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Expense Drivers as Percent of Total Expenses: Entitlement + One-Time Items Are Crowding Out Other Federal Spending 1965 — 2005 USA Real Federal Expenses Mix by Category Share of Total Expenses 40-yr ‘05 vs. 40-yr 1965 2005 Average Variance Entitlement Expenses 21% 51% 42% 9% Defense 43 20 24 -4 Non-Defense Discretionary* 29 22 23 -1 Net Interest Payments 7 7 11 4 Total Federal Expenses 100% 100% 100% 0% Normal Note: All data are inflation adjusted using GDP price index from BEA; ’05 vs. 40-yr variance is rounded. *Non-defense discretionary KP spending includes education, infrastructure, agriculture, housing, etc. Data source: White House Office of Management & Budget. (@)E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 231 Category Expenses as Percent of Expenses: Observations from Previous Slide Entitlement spending has risen to 51% of total spending, higher than 40- year average of 42% (and much higher than the 21% in 1965), defense spending has fallen to 20% from 24% average, non-defense discretionary spending (including education, infrastructure, energy, law enforcement and veteran services) has fallen to 22% from 23%, and net interest payments have fallen to 7% from 11%, despite higher debt (largely because of declining interest rates). These trends have become more pronounced in recent years. Questions: 1) Should entitlement spending account for 51% (and rising) share of total USA Inc.’s spending, while other key areas (such as education, infrastructure, energy, law enforcement...) account for only 22% (and falling) of spending? Note: All data are inflation adjusted using GDP price index from BEA; ’05 vs. 40-yr variance is rounded. KP Data source: White House Office of Management & Budget. (@E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 232

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.kpcb.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.