Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-27225House OversightOther

Academic email chain discussing gene subfunctionalization among researchers

The passage contains a routine scientific discussion about genetics with no allegations, financial flows, or misconduct. It mentions several academics and philanthropists, but no actionable leads link Email exchange between Robert Trivers, Alan Rogers, and others about gene duplication and subfunctio Mentions a list of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Jeffrey Epstein, Gordon Getty) but only as CC r

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #025589
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains a routine scientific discussion about genetics with no allegations, financial flows, or misconduct. It mentions several academics and philanthropists, but no actionable leads link Email exchange between Robert Trivers, Alan Rogers, and others about gene duplication and subfunctio Mentions a list of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Jeffrey Epstein, Gordon Getty) but only as CC r

Tags

geneticsacademic-correspondencescience-discussionhouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Robert Trivers _ a | Sent: 4/14/2018 5:06:12 PM To: Alan Rogers |i « Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] cc: Gordon Getty i Oliver Goodenough | | Tim Kane EE, Rob Hanson i: Paul Zak |); Bobby McCormick | ey Anderson EE); Clive Crook | iE, ); (Viatt Ridley Ee |; Gerry Ohrstrom iS ; Lee Silver (iy Monika Gruter Cheney (iE : Dane Stangler RR on Bailey (TE ; Aona Oreber ES: Anula Jayasuriya |; Paul Romer (Ds; Vike Cagney |i: Evan Sith Roger Edelen [ES]; Bill Prezant i) John Mallen (x ; Jim Halligan i \Varcuerite Atkins (iE); Alex.Family Pines (PS |; Ditsa Pines | avid Car st |e |; president@usfca.edu; Clair Brown |i ; (Vis. Yvette Robbins Richerson, Peter) Subject: Re: Free Growth (09-29-17) part 2.pdf Importance: — High yes Alan i think you are you are referring to duplication of a gene—there are many such genes including those produced by retrotransposons (as evidenced by lack of introns)—where a gene has two separate effects and there is an advantage to having a gene with each effect you will often prefer two genes to one, because of less interference in fitness effects Peter was talking about a gene with a single effect—sickling—and the other allele is the normal one—the heterozygote destroys malaria within red blood cells at trivial cost and there is no cost at all if malaria is not present—by contrast homozygous sickle individuals suffer lifetime effects Peter was trying to conjure up a heterozygote that propagated asexually but this requires a chiasma between neighbouring genes, a very rare event and hence it usually leads rapidly to mutational decay of one of the two copies, i.e. so-called pseudogenes, of which there are many in our genome in haste On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Alan Rogers > wrote: haven't read whatever Pete wrote, but if I understand Bob correctly, Pete must be talking about subfunctionalization: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subfunctionalization so, it's not a radical suggestion. It's thought to be the process that gave rise to all multi-gene families. Michael Lynch discusses it in his book, The Origin of Genome Architecture. Am I missing something? Alan On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Robert Trivers (> wrote:

Technical Artifacts (4)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailjeevacation@gmail.com
Emailpresident@usfca.edu
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subfunctionalization
Wire Refreferring

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.