Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-27561House OversightOther

Email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and a private individual discussing religion and secular dogma

The passage contains a routine academic discussion with no concrete allegations, financial details, or links to powerful officials or agencies. It offers no actionable leads for investigation. Participants: Lawrence Krauss (ASU professor), Noam Chomsky (public intellectual), and a private ema Topic: Debate over the role of religion and secular nationalism in society. No mention of any government b

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #028933
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains a routine academic discussion with no concrete allegations, financial details, or links to powerful officials or agencies. It offers no actionable leads for investigation. Participants: Lawrence Krauss (ASU professor), Noam Chomsky (public intellectual), and a private ema Topic: Debate over the role of religion and secular nationalism in society. No mention of any government b

Tags

academic-correspondencesecularismreligionhouse-oversightpublic-discourse

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Lawrence Krauss Sent: 9/10/2015 8:08:32 PM To: Noam Chomsky yy cc: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]; ii Subject: Re: an article you may both hate. or like. Attachments: DA866543-7401-4A5A-8E50-FD32E33A50EC.png Importance: — High Yup. Lawrence M. Krauss Director, The Origins Project at ASU Foundation Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office [EE Assistant i Origins Office origins.asu.edu | twitter.com/Ikrauss1 | krauss.faculty.asu.edu Sent from my iPhone On Sep 10, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Noam Chomsky i wrote: | quite agree. And I’m pretty sure Lawrence does too. From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@ gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 3:02 PM To: Noam Chomsky Si Cc: Lawrence Krauss Subject: Re: an article you may both hate. or like. I think religion plays a major positive role in many lives. . i dont like fanaticism on either side. . sorry On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Noam Chomsky qq wrote: Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total. On confronting dogma, | of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find dismantling myths of “American exceptionalism” or “Israeli self-defense” or Obama’s mass murder campaign, etc., offensive — so be it. But | don’t see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while recognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their beliefs are confronted with evidence. | also don’t see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as | don’t think we should ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with

Technical Artifacts (6)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainkrauss.faculty.asu.edu
Domainorigins.asu.edu
Domaintwitter.com
Emailjeevacation@gmail.com
Phone287-1404
Phone866543-7401

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.