Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-28195House OversightOther

Girl drops lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein amid parental dispute

The passage reveals a pending civil suit involving Jeffrey Epstein and a minor, the involvement of a former federal prosecutor (Guy Lewis) now defending Epstein, and mentions prior criminal indictment Epstein was sued by a minor (Jane Doe) for alleged sexual activity when she was 14. The lawsuit was dropped because the girl's parents could not agree on litigation strategy. The girl's father previo

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021525
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals a pending civil suit involving Jeffrey Epstein and a minor, the involvement of a former federal prosecutor (Guy Lewis) now defending Epstein, and mentions prior criminal indictment Epstein was sued by a minor (Jane Doe) for alleged sexual activity when she was 14. The lawsuit was dropped because the girl's parents could not agree on litigation strategy. The girl's father previo

Tags

civil-lawsuitjeffrey-epsteinformer-federal-prosecutorminor-victimlegal-defensepalm-beachfinancial-flow-potential-settlconflict-of-interestsexual-assaultlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Os/-29080/ -~NW -7/S| a fr o- ee | Girl drops lawsuit against Palm Beach man By LARRY KELLER Palm Beach Post Staff Writer ‘A girl who says that wealthy money manager and parttime Palm Beach resident Jeffrey Epstein engaged in *. sexual activity with her when she was 14, has dropped her lawsuit against him because her divorced parents are squabbling over the litigation. “It has to do with the fact that the parents aren’t on the same page right ¢ now,” said Jeffrey Herman, the attorney - for the girl, identified in court papers only as Jane Doe. “It’s like a sideshow.” ‘The girl turns 18 in May and can‘sue - » again at that time without her parents’ * involvement, Herman said. » Herman sued Epstein Jast month on * behalf of the girl, her father and her stepmother. Her birth mother, who lives near Atlanta, then asked. to intervene on her daughter's behalf and asked that P ; wee te ee mL “| the litigation be halted until her daughter turns 18. - The mother com- plained that Jane Doe’s father’ did not consult with her or their daughter before sting Epstein ‘for $50mil- Epstein lion. The lawsuit al- Accused of leges sexual assault, sexually. intentional _ infliction assaulting then- of emotional distress 14-year-old gir, and loss of parental consortiuni. Herman : also represents a Jane Doe No. 2 ane, like Jane Doe, claims Epstein summoned her to his home for . a massage when she was a minor and sexually touched her. Epstein, 55, induced several under age girls to give him sexual massages a et at his Intracoastal home, a Palm Beach Police Department investigation con- cluded. He was indicted in July 2006 on a single count of felony solicitation of prostitution. The case is pending. Jane Does parents separated. two months after she was born at Good Sa- maritan Medical Center, according to court records. The couple’s subsequent divorce has been contentious. Eacli has had primary custody of the girl at various times. The father pleaded guilty to. fed- eral fraud charges in 2001-and was sen- tenced to 21 months i in federal prison, plus three years’ probation. The US. attorney overseeing his prosecution was Guy Lewis. Now in private practice, Lewis was hired by Epstein to defend ' him against the father’s lawsuit filed on behalf of Jane Doe. @larry_keller@pbpost.com Jeyoereyo UOI]BOUISSEID ‘e0INO Bulywugns 290801-ININ-S LE WIN uew yoeeg wed ysurebe ynsme| Sdosp LIS $10 APRALA (mofag soeds ul Bulddijo junoyy JA ‘yoesg Wied Ise 380 yorag Wied sul / gl (‘aye}s pue Ayo ‘“Wededsmou (18-8-§ “Aeuy) OSe-d4

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emaillarry_keller@pbpost.com

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

55p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01682733

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 57

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rule 56.1, move for summary judgment on the issue of the United States Government's violation of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), where no genuine issue of material fact exists.' In support, they state: INTRODUCTION In 2004, Congress enacted the CVRA because it found that in case after case "victims, and their families, were ignored, cast aside, and treated as non-participants in a critical event in their lives. They were

982p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01682733

100p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 1 of 24

24p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

39p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.