Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-28230House OversightOther

Nonsensical physics analogy with no actionable information

The passage consists of a vague, incoherent discussion of a Bell test analogy and random characters, containing no names, dates, transactions, or credible allegations involving any influential actors. Mentions Bell test experiment and Einstein's quote Uses clothing analogy to describe photon information Contains garbled text and no factual claims

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #016024
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage consists of a vague, incoherent discussion of a Bell test analogy and random characters, containing no names, dates, transactions, or credible allegations involving any influential actors. Mentions Bell test experiment and Einstein's quote Uses clothing analogy to describe photon information Contains garbled text and no factual claims

Tags

physicstheoreticalmiscellaneoushouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
334 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet? This is quite a complex piece of mathematics so let me show you how it works. Again, our thought experiment relies on an analogy involving clothing — sorry. In the Bell Test experiment three polarizers are set up at 0, % and % of the way around a circle, 120 degrees apart. For Einstein to be correct photons must each carry at least three pieces of information: If I meet the 0 degree polarizer do I go through or not? If I meet the 120 degree polarizer do I go through or not? If I meet the 240 degree polarizer do I go through or not? If a photon had only one piece of information, say that it was vertically polarized, it would not know what to do if it came across a polarizer at 45 degrees. In that case the photon would sometimes go through and sometimes not, with a fifty-fifty probability. But Einstein did not want to countenance probability. “God does not play dice with the Universe.” He required certainty. “I like to think the Moon is there when I am not watching it” The photons must know enough to handle, with certainty, any eventuality they may come across. (We could set up experiments with a more complex set of choices, dividing the photons into quarters, fifths and so on, but thirds are simple numbers and we can use the children’s clothing analogy to demonstrate the mathematics.) z2z2<<<< EF ; Zz<=<22<< GE) z<<2<22< HHoouoo ow F- wonooHnoak ° Hats, Scarves, and Gloves

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.