Katie Walsh’s role linking the RNC to the Trump campaign and transition Index of names and topics from HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020130 document

Case File

d-28255House OversightOther

Court filing references Prince Andrew denial and Buckingham Palace statement in defamation case

The passage mentions high‑profile figures (Prince Andrew, Buckingham Palace) but only in the context of a routine evidentiary argument in a defamation lawsuit. It provides no concrete new allegations, Defense seeks to admit an FBI 302 motion as evidence, claiming authenticity but lacking chain‑of‑cus Plaintiff cites Prince Andrew’s denial of [REDACTED - Survivor]’ claims and a Buckingham Palace stateme

Date

November 11, 2025

Source

House Oversight

Reference

House Oversight #011353

Pages

Persons

Integrity

No Hash Available

Summary

Persons Referenced (2)

Prince Andrew

“...Honor, that's chain of custody. With regard to motion in limine number 5, evidence of denials by Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace. Again, your Honor, in a defamation case -- and I'm now quoting from plaint...”

Virginia Giuffre

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure

Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 50 H3VOGIU1 response an FBI 302 motion xcuse m statement of -- she claims is authentic, but she doesn't know how it was redacted, doesn't explain how it's redacted, but she wants to admit that into evidence. We are actually offering to put on the stand the person who submitted the FOIA request to explain what was requested and what was received. That is not expert testimony, your Honor, that's chain of custody. With regard to motion in limine number 5, evidence of denials by Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace. Again, your Honor, in a defamation case -- and I'm now quoting from plaintiff's treatise that they cited throughout their response and their reply xcuse m "In defamation cases, defendants can also prove that other liables and rumors about the claimant are circulating, at least if they are widespread, to demonstrate that it is not what the defendant said about the plaintiff that causes her reputation to suffer but what others said." Plaintiff also cites Sack of Defamation. He supports our position, your Honor. Here, we have a statement by Buckingham Palace that was issued on the internet and widely circulated. There is also a videotape of Prince Andrew denying [REDACTED]' claims. Both of those were far more circulated than anything Ms. Maxwell said, as evidenced by the fact that plaintiff can't even find Ms. Maxwell's statement on SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(212) 805-0300

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

Civil lawsuit alleges Epstein‑Maxwell sex‑trafficking scheme tied to federal plea negotiations and possible high‑level cover‑up

Civil lawsuit alleges Epstein‑Maxwell sex‑trafficking scheme tied to federal plea negotiations and possible high‑level cover‑up The passage provides concrete allegations from a civil complaint (named plaintiff Ransome) that Jeffrey Epstein recruited a young masseuse with promises of fashion‑design work, kept her passport, and forced sex with powerful figures. It links the timeline to a non‑prosecution agreement negotiated by federal prosecutors (including an unnamed Acosta) and notes that the deal quashed an FBI investigation. The mention of Prince Andrew, [REDACTED - Survivor], and potential involvement of senior DOJ officials gives actionable leads (names, dates, alleged transactions) that merit follow‑up, though the claims are unverified and rely on a single civil filing. Key insights: Ransome’s civil complaint (filed Jan 2017) alleges Epstein promised career help in exchange for sex and kept her passport.; Complaint ties alleged abuse to the period when Epstein’s lawyers were negotiating a non‑prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors (Acosta et al.).; The plea deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges, receive a private‑wing jail sentence, and allegedly halted an FBI probe into an international trafficking network.

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Compilation of public links referencing Jeffrey Epstein and associated personalities

The passage merely aggregates publicly available web links and generic descriptions about Jeffrey Epstein, his foundation, and his alleged connections. It provides no new factual leads, specific trans List of URLs to Wikipedia, news articles, and promotional sites about Epstein. Mentions of known associates such as Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Leslie Wexne References to Epste

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01385042

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Donate More ways to support →

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.

Court filing references Prince Andrew denial and Buckingham Palace statement in defamation case

Summary

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

Ask AI About This Document