Judge Marra's Ruling on Victims' Rights Allegations and Potential Giuffre Testimony

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3VOGIU1 extremely patient. Let me just point 19. 87 take two more minutes to cover This is Judge Marra's ruling. They say we want to put it in that she lost. our view, actually, get her into the case, participate by being a witness. Now, are we Well, in that was a victory. Our goal was to try to and Judge Marra ruled that she could really going to try the implications of Judge Marra's ruling in a pro bono Crime Victims Rights Act organization ruling? thing. It's highly, first, prejudicial in the sense that it attention away from the facts at And again, Judge Marra reasons that we offered for putting those allegations in. th He ruled on this, irrelevant, others w but allowed this other and obviously, highly C's going to divert the jury's t hand here. only ruled on the first of nine He "LL § said point 1 doesn't work, out. The litigation is moving forward. how things play I can tell you the government will be responding to our summary judgment motion, I believe on May 15th. litigation continues. We'll be replying on July 15th, so the The last point that I'll make is Boylan. This is item 20. Remember, Dershowitz is going to say that Boylan says that Ms. Giuffre said certain things. And we were told that, well, maybe she will be a witness. It's my understanding that Boylan is not on the final SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (2:12 ) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011390