Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-28552House OversightFinancial Record

Oil market risk‑reversal trading memo with no evident investigative leads

The document is a purely financial strategy note describing leveraged trades on oil ETFs and European oil‑&‑gas equities. It contains no allegations, no mention of high‑ranking officials or agencies e Recommends a leveraged X‑market risk reversal: sell USO puts to fund SXEP calls. Notes current oil price dip (~$40/bbl) as a buying opportunity, expecting a rebound to $55/bbl by ye Highlights that t

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #025987
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a purely financial strategy note describing leveraged trades on oil ETFs and European oil‑&‑gas equities. It contains no allegations, no mention of high‑ranking officials or agencies e Recommends a leveraged X‑market risk reversal: sell USO puts to fund SXEP calls. Notes current oil price dip (~$40/bbl) as a buying opportunity, expecting a rebound to $55/bbl by ye Highlights that t

Tags

commoditiesrisk-reversalboeoilfinancial-flowmarket-speculationtrading-strategybofa-merrill-lynchecbhouse-oversightfinance

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Volatility in Europe Buy the seasonal oil dip via bullish X-market risk reversals Levered X-market risk reversal: Sell 1x USO 3M 25d (~88% strike) puts to fully fund 2.1x SXEP (Oil & Gas equity) 25d (~106% strike) calls (indic.) Alternative (unlevered) implementation: Sell USO 25d puts to fund fully fund closer to the money SXEP calls The seasonal sell-off in oil presents a ‘buy the dip’ opportunity according to our commodity strategists, who expect prices to rebound to $55/bbl by year end. In fact current levels of ~$40 are close to the summer floor ($39) they had previously suggested. BofAML strategists have turned bullish Oil & Gas equities given more CB (BoE) easing, attractive div yields and exposure to the EM recovery narrative. Moreover, Oil & Gas has been the worst performing Stoxx 600 sector over the last 1M, suggesting it has ample scope to rally if it is to catch up to the broader equity market (Chart 15). USO (Oil ETF) puts are rich vs. SXEP (European Oil & Gas equity) calls: The number of long SXEP 25d calls that can be fully funded by selling 1 short USO 25d put is near historical highs (90" percentile since ’08, Chart 16). In contrast, both SXEP and USO risk reversals are only modestly more attractive than their historical medians. SXEP calls would have offered better value than USO calls at current levels in terms of average historical payoffs as well as the frequency of positive returns (when sized for the same upfront cost, Chart 17). Note that an unlevered implementation of the trade allows for early participation in any potential SXEP rally (as the SXEP call strike is near the money) while providing a ~12% buffer before incurring losses (at expiry) on the short USO leg (Chart 18). CSPP has purchased an outsized proportion of Energy corporate bonds and this has yet to feed through to equities according to our credit strategists (Chart 19): The number of Energy corporate bonds bought by the ECB is approx. 45% of the total eligible amount — the 3“ highest proportion across all European sectors. Potential USO losses may be dampened if the recent $/Oil correlation persists: Since mid-2015 oil drawdowns have largely coincided with USD weakening (Chart 20). Chart 15: SXEP (Oil & Gas equity) has been the worst performing Stoxx 600 sector over the last IM 20% 15% 10% 5% 1M Sector Performance SXXP return 0% [ cient | ae | 5% 14 SSESEESSSESESSSSS AGI oO >< pul Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data from 7-Jul-16 to 5-Aug-16. Chart 16: The leverage provided by the X-market risk reversal (long SXEP call / short USO put) is attractive from a historical standpoint —_ 7 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% SXEP call vs. SXEP call USO call vs. put vs. put m# of long 3M 25d calls per short 3M 25d put percentile of ratio (rhs)* Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research. Data as of 5-Aug-16, using indicative mid prices. *Percentiles since Jan-08. 10 Global Equity Volatility Insights | O09 August 2016 BankofAmerica <2” Merrill Lynch

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.