Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-28671House OversightOther

Federal Revenue Growth Data (1965‑2005) Compared to GDP – Economic Overview

The passage provides historical, publicly‑available tax revenue statistics sourced from the White House OMB and a consulting firm. It contains no allegations, unnamed individuals, or novel controversy Average federal revenue grew ~3% annually from 1965‑2005, roughly matching GDP growth. Corporate income taxes grew ~2% annually over the same period. Social insurance taxes (Social Security/Medicare)

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #020954
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides historical, publicly‑available tax revenue statistics sourced from the White House OMB and a consulting firm. It contains no allegations, unnamed individuals, or novel controversy Average federal revenue grew ~3% annually from 1965‑2005, roughly matching GDP growth. Corporate income taxes grew ~2% annually over the same period. Social insurance taxes (Social Security/Medicare)

Tags

white-house-ombfiscal-policyeconomic-datatax-revenuehouse-oversightgdp-growth

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Revenue Growth: Average Federal Revenue (Driven by Taxes) In-Line With GDP Growth 1965 — 2005 USA Real Federal Income Growth by Category vs. Real GDP Growth Revenue Growth ‘05 vs 40-yr 1965 Y/Y 2005Y/Y | 40-yr CAGR| Variance Comments Individual Income Taxes 11% 11% 3% 8% Individual & corporate income taxes are cyclical; 2005 Y/Y growth were significantly Corporate Income Taxes 15 43 2 41 affected by economic recovery post 2001 recession. Social Insurance Taxes 12 5 1 Social insurance taxes & other fees are less cyclical. Social insurance taxes grew Other Taxes & Fees -5 1 1 0 significantly faster than GDP. Total Federal Revenue 9% 11% 8% Real GDP 7% 3% 0% “Normal” Note: All data are inflation adjusted using GDP price index from BEA; ’05 vs. 40-yr variance is rounded. KP Data source: White House Office of Management & Budget. (@)E) www.kpcb.com USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? 225 Revenue Growth: Observations from Previous Slide We chose a 40-year period from 1965 to 2005 to examine ‘normal’ levels of revenue and expenses. We did not choose the most recent 40-year period (1969 to 2009) as USA was in deep recession in 2008 / 2009 and underwent significant tax policy fluctuations in 1968 /1969 and subsequently many metrics (like individual income and corporate profit) varied significantly from ‘normal’ levels. Total USA Inc. revenue (collected via taxes) has grown at an average 3% annual rate, in-line with 40-year GDP growth rate. Corporate taxes have -— on average — grown at 2% annually over 40 years. Social insurance taxes (for Social Security and Medicare) have grown at an average 5% annual rate, above the 3% GDP growth. Questions: 1) How crucial is the role played by lower relative tax rates — especially for corporations — in stimulating job and GDP growth and helping American maintain / gain / constrain loss of global competitive advantage? 2) Should social insurance tax growth be more closely aligned with GDP growth? Note: All data are inflation adjusted using GDP price index from BEA; 05 vs. 40-yr variance is rounded. KP Data source: White House Office of Management & Budget. www.kpcb.com ne. at Might a Turnaround Expert Consider? B kpeb USA Inc. | What Might a T id rt Consider? 226

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainwww.kpcb.com

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.