Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-28754House OversightOther

Attorney Jay Lefkowitz offers to answer questions about client Jeffrey Epstein

The passage is a standard attorney-client communication offering to provide factual answers about Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no specific allegations, dates, transactions, or new connections to power Email from Jay Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis to Alexandra Wolfe (House Oversight staff). Lefkowitz states press coverage of Epstein is inaccurate and offers to answer factual questions. Contains stan

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #019410
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a standard attorney-client communication offering to provide factual answers about Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no specific allegations, dates, transactions, or new connections to power Email from Jay Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis to Alexandra Wolfe (House Oversight staff). Lefkowitz states press coverage of Epstein is inaccurate and offers to answer factual questions. Contains stan

Tags

legal-correspondencejeffrey-epsteinattorney-client-privilegelegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
too lenient or too harsh and why? -what is his side of the story and have people been supportive? -Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc? From: Jay Lefkowitz [mailto : Sent: Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM To: wolfe, Alexandra Subject: Dear Ms. Wolfe, I understand you have some questions about my client, Jeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage surrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some instances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you send me any facutal questions so that I can provide you with accurate responses. I_am_also available to speak with you. My number is Thank you, BERBAKAKEBASAEABAKAE EERE SEER AEE EERE AREER EEE EEE EEE EEE EEE E EEE The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to postmaster@kirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. BARBARA AEAAAE AERA AE EERE E EEE AE SEER EEE REESE EER EEE EEE ESE SEES This e-mail, including attachments, is intended for the person(s) or company named and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information may be unlawful and is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and notify the sender. BABAK AEAAKAEA BAKER EERE E EAR AREER EERE ERE E ERE EEE EEE EEE EE EES The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Emailpostmaster@kirkland.com

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United States Attorney's Office in Miami (the "USAO"), not only has it has remained unwilling to address these issues, but Mr. Epstein's defense counsel has been instructed to limit its contact to the very prosecutors who are the subject of this misconduct complaint. For your review, this document summarizes the USAO's conduct in this case. Background 1. In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Palm Beach resident, Jeffrey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. 2. In July 2006, after an intensive probe, including interviews of dozens of witnesses, re

11p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 09-34791-RBR

39p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)" alMIN>

From: (USAFLS)" alMIN> To: NIEliSAFLSr alMIE>, Subject: Status of Outstanding Motions/Discovery issue Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:36:39 +0000 Importance: Normal (USAFLS)" Hi IN and There are several motions that are fully briefed but have not been decided: DE50: Petitioners' Motion for an Order Directing the U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence (this was "held in abeyance" while the Court ordered "limited discovery"). DE51: Petitioners' Motion to Use Correspondence to Provide Violations of the CVRA and to Have their Unredacted Pleadings Unsealed. DE56: Motion to Intervene by Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz DE93: Motion for Limited Intervention by Jeffrey Epstein The first three were all addressed by the Court at the August 12, 2011 hearing, although the Court allowed supplemental briefing after the hearing on DE56. The last of that supplemental briefing was filed on 10/31/2011. DE93 was fully briefed on 10/14/2011. The 90-day mark on D

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.