Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment – Legal Argument on Malicious Prosecution and Abuse of ProcessArizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Fox Fashion Agency declines collaboration over alleged sex‑trafficking links to Jean‑Luc Brunel
Title Matchkaggle-ho-011965
Case Filed-28849House OversightFox Fashion Agency declines collaboration over alleged sex‑trafficking links to Jean‑Luc Brunel
November 11, 20251p4 persons
Case File
d-28849House OversightFox Fashion Agency declines collaboration over alleged sex‑trafficking links to Jean‑Luc Brunel
Other
The passage mentions a refusal to work with a partner because of concerns about Jean‑Luc Brunel and alleged sex‑trafficking articles. While it flags a potential link to a known figure in the modeling‑ Fox Fashion Agency cites Jean‑Luc Brunel as a long‑time partner with no prior issues. Agency claims parents of new models are scared after seeing “bad articles” about sex trafficking. Agency halts pl
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011965
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.