Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-29348House OversightOther

Court Transcript Fragment Discussing Omnibus Motion and Defamation Evidence

The excerpt is a disjointed courtroom dialogue with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It merely references procedural arguments about charac Mentions an omnibus motion in limine aimed at excluding plaintiff's claims. Cites Rule 405(b) regarding character evidence in defamation. References a prior motion to dismiss dated February 29th of a

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011346
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The excerpt is a disjointed courtroom dialogue with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It merely references procedural arguments about charac Mentions an omnibus motion in limine aimed at excluding plaintiff's claims. Cites Rule 405(b) regarding character evidence in defamation. References a prior motion to dismiss dated February 29th of a

Tags

court-transcriptevidencedefamationlegal-procedurelegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 43 H3VOGIU1 so that we can keep the fact that we have done something bad that should then be held against our client away from the jury. But all these remaining things we are in agreement, I think with the suggestion you were perhaps making a moment ago, we can deal with these issues at trial. That's our omnibus motion in limine, your Honor. THE COURT: Thank you. MS. MENNINGER: The omnibus motion reads like a list of everything plaintiff has lied about or anything that would undercut her claim for damages. Plaintiff quoted Passim in her reply brief froma particular federal evidence treatise, and I would like to tell the Court, she left out the most important parts, and that is the ones that relate to 405(b). As that treatise reads, "Character is an element of a defense in a defamation case if the defending party claims that the statements in question are true and seeks to prove that the plaintiff has the character ascribed to her or to reduce damages by showing that her reputation is so bad the statement did no harm. "In such cases, pursuant to Rule 405, all forms of character evidence are admissible wherever relevant, including opinion, reputation, and specific instances of conduct." As your Honor found in our motion to dismiss ruling of February 29th of last year, "Though defendant never called SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(212) 805-0300

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.