Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-29539House OversightPolice Report

Transcript excerpt questioning witness about alleged Epstein involvement and police statements

The passage provides a vague courtroom exchange about Jeffrey Epstein and a witness's statements, but lacks concrete names of powerful actors, specific dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It off Witness was asked if Epstein ever visited his father's house – answer: no. Witness denied that Epstein's associates tampered with his father's tires. Witness claimed to have told police they did not

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012459
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides a vague courtroom exchange about Jeffrey Epstein and a witness's statements, but lacks concrete names of powerful actors, specific dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It off Witness was asked if Epstein ever visited his father's house – answer: no. Witness denied that Epstein's associates tampered with his father's tires. Witness claimed to have told police they did not

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinwitness-testimonycourt-transcriptlaw-enforcementlegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 —_ oO Oo Oa 4 OD oO fF WO NWN ~0929104.TXT almost killed him." Didn't you say that? A. Not to my knowledge or recollection. | have never said anything !ike that. A. Yeah. Q. Because Mr. Epstein never came to your 75 dad's house, correct? A. Correct. Q. And no one who worked for Mr. Epstein ever did something to your dad's tires. Did they? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Lack of foundation, predicate. Don't guess. BY MR. TEIN: Q. It's not true that Mr. Epstein almost killed your father, is it? MR. LEOPOLD: Objection. Asked and answered, lack of foundation, predicate. BY MR. TEIN: Q. You can answer. A. No. Q. Now you told the police that you didn't know who was in the car with you and Hayley on the day you went to Epstein's house, didn't you? Yes. And that was a lie, wasn't it? It's the truth. o> 2 > You told the police that there was someone Page 64

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedFeb 3, 2024

Epstein Drop Three

January 5, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until c

1391p
House OversightPolice ReportNov 11, 2025

Transcript excerpt shows alleged false statements to police about Jeffrey Epstein

The passage contains a vague interrogation about alleged false statements to police concerning Jeffrey Epstein. It lacks concrete names beyond Epstein, no dates, transactions, or actionable details, a Witness is questioned about lying to police regarding Epstein allegedly trying to murder his father. No documentary evidence or specific statements are presented. The dialogue references a prior tape

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 1 of 116 From ne Page 47/51 Date. 5/29/2008 12 09 L' • Si esta responder u la demanda per su cueille, al mismo tiempo en que prise= su respucsta ante il tribunal, debeni ustett envier por comme o entregar une copia de su rapueste a la persona denominada abaju corne "PlaintifUPlaintiffs Attorney" (Demandante o Abogado del Demandante). "De acuerdo con el Acto 6 Decreto de los Ameriennsos con Impedirnentos, inhabilitados, persona.; en necesidad del servicio special para panicipar en este procedimiento deberin, dcntm de un 'derme rezonable, antes de cualquier proœdimicnto, ponerse en contacto con is officine Administratutiva dc la Cone, 205 North Dixie Highway, oficina 52500, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, Téléfono (561) 355-2431, 1-800-955-8771 (I'DD) 6 1-800-955-8770 (V), Via Floride Relay Service". pv1FOR'FANT Des poursuites judiciaires ont etc entreprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours ormsecu

116p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

ROY BLACK

ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SaYIT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMPY? MARIA NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J.lAPIRO JARED BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF P.A. May 18, 2010 VIA EMAIL AND U.S. MAIL Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Counsel: JESSICA FONSECA-NADER KATHLEEN P. PHILLIPS AARON ANTHON MARCOS BEATON, JR. JENIPER J. SOULUCIAS NOAH FOX JOSHUA SHORE E-Mail: RBlack(lfioyBlack.com Jeff Sloman, Esq. United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 Assistant United States Attorney 99 N.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 We received notice this morning that Podhurst Orseck, P.A. has filed a civil complaint seeking over $2,000,000 in addition to the $526,000 they have already been paid by Jeffrey Epstein for their work as attorney representatives. As we communicated to you during our February 3, 2010

49p
House OversightPolice ReportNov 11, 2025

Transcript excerpt from House Oversight hearing referencing Epstein and parental police report

The passage contains a fragmented dialogue with no concrete names, dates, or transactions. It merely alludes to a police report about Jeffrey Epstein and mentions parental testimony, but provides no a Witness is questioned about a police report filed by their parents concerning Jeffrey Epstein. The dialogue suggests possible coaching of testimony, which could imply procedural improprieties. Refere

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Witness refuses to confirm Leopold's $50M lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein citing privilege

The passage hints at a possible $50 million lawsuit filed by a Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no names, dates, court docket numbers, or corroborating d Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The witness claims no knowledge of the lawsuit, invoking attorney‑client privilege. The questioning appears to

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.