Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-30217House OversightFinancial Record

Alleged Epstein admission of liability and remarks to journalist George Rush cited in Jane Doe civil suit filing

The passage references a purported statement by Jeffrey Epstein to journalist George Rush admitting liability for sexual abuse of a Jane Doe and downplaying his conduct. It also mentions a lawsuit fil Jane Doe alleges Epstein admitted liability for her abuse in a conversation with George Rush. Rush reportedly taped the conversation and discussed it with investigator Michael Fisten. Epstein filed a

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013464
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage references a purported statement by Jeffrey Epstein to journalist George Rush admitting liability for sexual abuse of a Jane Doe and downplaying his conduct. It also mentions a lawsuit fil Jane Doe alleges Epstein admitted liability for her abuse in a conversation with George Rush. Rush reportedly taped the conversation and discussed it with investigator Michael Fisten. Epstein filed a

Tags

jeffrey-epsteintaped-evidencefinancial-flowmedia-evidencesexual-abusemedia-interactioncivil-litigationfifth-amendmentlegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
‘claim against Epstein. By‘its nature, sexual molestation takes place i in private, with only the abuser and. os with only Epstein and Jane Doe present during the abuse. Jane Doe has no other reasonable avenues of “ him. es statement from. Epstein on these subjects. “15 year old girl, forced her. to have. sex with his friends and flew her.on his: private plane. Nationally. ‘and’ - ie a Rush that that case. was: dismissed, in a-way to: indicate that the: allegat tions are. ridiculous and untrue. 7 , ‘present ducing acts of sential abuse by Epstein.:In any event, ALL of those individuals have also. invoked : their 5" amendment rights: against self-incrimination, and thus have left Plaintiff with.no information- “i about what Epstein or other conspirators inside. his house were doing during the sexual abuse ofJane ..- . .. | Doe and other minors girls.’ This creates a serious issué for Jane. Doe in proving her sexual molestation | , the victim typically available to testify. In this case, Epstein’s abuse of Jane Doe took place‘in private, - discovery to provide | direct proof of claim of sexual abuse by Epstein. | i oe 4 11. Additionally, Mr. Epstein: has recently filed a lawsuit against me , abseil that Fas no. . merit whatsoever, a fact known to. Mr. Epstein. and. his attorneys. He filed the lawsuit against Brad . Edwards, Scott Rothstein, and [another Epstein victim of his molestation). That lawsuit implies that L.M.’s civil case ‘against him (currently: pending in Florida state court) is fabricated and that [and I ; have conspired to commit-fraud against. him (presumably that she made up the case against him, 4 implying that he does ‘not know. While the present subpoena before the Court has. been filed by ue Jane Doe, the Court should be aware that attorneys representing nay also file a Sao for the age Rush tape shortly. : _ 12. . Despite Mr. Epstein and all of his co- conspirators; ascerting a a 5M amendment privilege a : -against self-incrimination, George Rush of the New York Daily news did contact me to. inform me that - , | Mr. Epstein spoke betsenally with him about i issues related to the various los of sex-abuse begat, ; i 413. ‘Paraphrasing eal: memory aFn my conversation » with Mr. Rush, Mr. Epstein told sin that he may have.come “too close to the line” but that he should not have been punished as severely as he was and that his conduct was at most worthy of a $100 fine. This is a statement that shows two things . -of great importance to Jane Doe’s pending civil action. First, it is in.effect an admission by Epstein of his: “eae __ liability-to Jane Doe for sexually abusing her. Jane Doe does not have any. other admission of Epstein of sae ~ his sexual abuse of her and Epstein has filed an answer to Jane Doe’s complaint that has the functional effect of denying abuse of her. ‘Jane Doe has diligently pursued all possible ways. of obtaining an : admission from Epstein: of his molestation of Jane Doe without success. Second, the statementtoMr . = I “> Rush is a clear demonstration that Epstein lacks remorse for committing felony. child molestation: against Tow ~ Jane Doe. This will bea. ‘central i issue in the punitive damages case. against Epstein at trial. Here again, ss _. | Jane Doe has diligently pursued all possible ways of obtaining a statement from Epstein: about his lack of =~ ue 4 “remorse for abusing Jane Doe without success. There. are no 0 other: reasonable means a obtaining aie gl ae a +. “Mr, Rush also told ine that Mr, Epstein spoke specially about ¢ one of my ve . ee and he: made derogatory remarks about her.. carrier & a tee er ea age ‘Additionally, | Mr. ‘Rush: said that Epstein. spoke directly about ‘another civil case that was : 7 i filed against him’ Gane Doe 102 v: Epstein); ‘that case alleges: that Epstein: repeatedly: sexually abused a a a oe ‘internationally ‘for the, purposes. of sexually. molesting - and. ‘abusing. her. : ‘Epstein: flippantly: told George : o 16. oe Mr. Rush indicated that he taped the. conversation between him and: Mr. Epstein, _ 5, Se Mr. “Rush also spoke at length to Michael Fisten, an investigator with: my'fi firm that. was - . assisting with the investigation of the case... Mr. Fisten reported to: me * shortly after the conversation with Mr. Rush that he: had such a conversation. . pclae tpi vale

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Extensive RRA Contact List Linking Donald Trump's Attorney and Multiple Epstein‑Case Lawyers

The document provides a detailed roster of attorneys, paralegals, investigators, and staff associated with the RRA (presumably a law firm or litigation consortium) handling Jeffrey Epstein‑related mat Alan Garten is identified as "Donald Trump's attorney" within the RRA contact list. Multiple attorneys are listed as "Counsel for other Epstein Victims," indicating a broader litigatio The list inclu

2p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Attorney alleges Rothstein used Epstein lawsuits to lure investors and links high‑profile associates to alleged child‑molestation scheme

The passage provides a potentially actionable lead that a law firm partner (Scott Rothstein) may have marketed litigation against Jeffrey Epstein to attract investors for his Ponzi scheme, and it name Attorney joined Rothstein’s firm in April 2009 and brought clients with lawsuits against Epstein. Allegations that Rothstein presented those lawsuits to investors to fund his Ponzi scheme. Claims tha

1p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bradley J. Edwards files renewed motion for summary judgment in Jeffrey Epstein civil case

The passage merely restates a routine procedural filing without revealing new evidence, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming Edwards seeks summary judgment, claiming no genuine issue of material fact. Alleges no evidence of fraud by Edwards against Epstein. References three alleged victims of Epstein linked to Edwards.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Counsel list filing for Jeffrey Epstein case (House Oversight document)

The document only provides attorney contact information and a case number for a filing related to Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑lev Case number: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Multiple law firms listed as counsel for Jeffrey Epstein Filing appears to be a notice of supplement in a court proceeding

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Concrete Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Misconduct

The document largely recaps existing reporting and court‑record reviews, noting that no hard evidence directly ties former President Bill Clinton to criminal activity by Jeffrey Epstein. It does highl Clinton appears on 13 documented flights on Epstein's private jet, often accompanied by Epstein aide Attorney Jack Scarola warned of “extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure” when a

10p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.