Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-30569House OversightOther

Attorney files affirmation supporting motion to unseal appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal

The passage reveals a procedural move to unseal court filings in a high‑profile Epstein case, potentially exposing prosecutorial conduct and law‑enforcement decisions. While it points to specific acto Affirmation filed by John M. Browning, attorney for NYP Holdings, publisher of the New York Post Motion seeks to unseal appellate briefs in the Jeffrey Epstein appeal (NY County Index No. 30129/10) E

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #016424
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals a procedural move to unseal court filings in a high‑profile Epstein case, potentially exposing prosecutorial conduct and law‑enforcement decisions. While it points to specific acto Affirmation filed by John M. Browning, attorney for NYP Holdings, publisher of the New York Post Motion seeks to unseal appellate briefs in the Jeffrey Epstein appeal (NY County Index No. 30129/10) E

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinmedia-influencepotential-misconductunsealingmedia-involvementprosecutorial-conductcourt-filingslegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION — FIRST DEPARTMENT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW : App. Div. No. 6081 YORK, : Respondent, : AFFIRMATION OF JOHN M. : BROWNING IN SUPPORT OF - against - : MOTION TO UNSEAL JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, : On Appeal from New York Supreme Court, Defendant-Appellant. : New York County, Index No. 30129/10 (Pickholz, J.) John M. Browning, an attorney duly admitted to practice before the Courts of the State of New York, affirms the following under penalties of perjury: 1. I am an associate of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, attorneys for non-party movant NYP Holdings, Inc., publisher of the New York Post (the “Post”) and I submit this affirmation in support of the Post’s motion to unseal the briefs filed by the parties in the above-captioned appeal. 2. The grounds for unsealing the appeal briefs in this action are set forth in the accompanying memorandum of law. I submit this affirmation to annex relevant documents and to state facts that are relevant to this motion, of which I have personal knowledge. 3. Annexed hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an article written by Julie K. Brown and published by the Miami Herald on November 28, 2018, entitled “Cops worked to put serial sex abuser in prison. Prosecutors worked to cut him a break.” 4. Annexed hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an article written by Rebecca Rosenberg and Danika Fears, which was published by the Post on January 7, 2015, entitled “DA’s office ‘went easy’ on sex offender Epstein.” 4840-5788-8644v. 1 3930033 -000039

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone1 3930033
Phone840-5788

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019

From: Cc: Bcc Subject: SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:12:37 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2019_7-9.pdf SDNY News Clips Tuesday, July 9, 2019 EFTA00076625 Contents Public Corruption Epstein Complex Frauds lure Terrorism & Narcotics Wise Honest Matters of Interest Trump Can't Block Twitter Followers US Appeals Court Rules Judicial Review of Claims of Government Misconduct in Parallel Investigations Barr Says Legal Path to Census Citizenship Question Exists but He Gives No Details Public Corruption Epstein Who Protected Jeffrey Epstein? New York Times By The Editorial Board 7/8/19 On Monday, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York unsealed a 14-page indictment against Jeffrey Epstein, charging the wealthy financier with operating and conspiring to operate a sex trafficking ring of girls out of his luxe homes on Manhattan's Upper East Side and in Palm Beach, Fla., "among other locations."

32p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case Amid Calls for DOJ Review

The passage reveals a recusal by a federal prosecutor in the high‑profile Epstein case and notes that AG nominee William Barr was pressed to investigate DOJ handling. This provides a concrete lead—rec Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office formally recused itself from the Epstein victims' rights case in early The case was reassigned to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta. Sen. Ben Sasse questioned AG nom

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01682059

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

511 922,419 FtIN;Cf

511 922,419 FtIN;Cf f ift - ( df)t— Th-tittsf e: wr iwi mcfn .3:95Kona - apt?? It * ci of * C PRCta MOSPats Details of a civil lawsuit, made public in January 2035, contained a deposition from "Jane Doe 3" that accused Maxwell of recruiting her in 1999, when she was a minor, and grooming her to provide sexual services for Epstein.M A 2018 expose by Julie K. Brown in the M' revealed Jane Doe 3 to be , who was previously known as met Maxwell at Donald 'frump's Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Florida, w en was a 16- year-old spa attendant.M She asserted that Maxwell had introduced her to Epstein, after which she was " omed by. the two [of them] for his pleasure, including lessons in Epstein's preferences during oral sex". 22n631 Maxwell has repeatedly denied any involvement in Epstein's crimes.L2i In a 2015 statement, Maxwell rejected allegations that she has acted as a procurer for Epstein and denied that she had "facilitated Prince Andrew's [alleged] acts of sexual abus

25p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office Recuses Itself from Jeffrey Epstein Case Amid DOJ Oversight Questions

The passage reveals that a federal prosecutor's office recused itself from the high‑profile Epstein victims’ rights case and notes a pending DOJ review prompted by Senate questioning of AG nominee Wil Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office formally recused itself from the Epstein victims’ rights case. The case was reassigned to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta. Sen. Ben Sasse questioned AG nominee Will

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5/19/22.3:52 PM POOL CIAR C•nlek• - Cakieg.N Meari PR.c57 tit/17O.

5/19/22.3:52 PM POOL CIAR C•nlek• - Cakieg.N Meari PR.c57 tit/17O. SlEu.) SE.4 ON_ ee\Z0SC. fkt ct JeamY EPstein WiklPedia frifte€036 C. Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, ; Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with ' November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterward.L ink A similar $5o-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer. LI-191 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.' 21 All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court' l Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.Q.M1 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States poi414-5Cr-0 A L e 13)56 StNG pitom 1.\)e<ri Pos iTICAva A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe i ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the Department of Justi

36p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.