Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-30693House OversightFinancial Record

Palm Beach police report documents massage payments to Jeffrey Epstein and attempts to subpoena former staff

The passage provides concrete details—names (Jeffrey Epstein, attorney Donald Morrell, attorney Guy Fronstin, detectives, a masseuse), dates (Nov 14‑16, 2005), payment amount ($300), and mentions of s Epstein received multiple massages at his Florida residence in 2005, paying a masseuse $300 per sess Police contacted Epstein’s former employees and their attorneys, and the State Attorney’s Office p

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #019004
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides concrete details—names (Jeffrey Epstein, attorney Donald Morrell, attorney Guy Fronstin, detectives, a masseuse), dates (Nov 14‑16, 2005), payment amount ($300), and mentions of s Epstein received multiple massages at his Florida residence in 2005, paying a masseuse $300 per sess Police contacted Epstein’s former employees and their attorneys, and the State Attorney’s Office p

Tags

floridajeffrey-epsteinfinancial-flowlaw-enforcementwitness-intimidationsubpoenalegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightmassage-servicessexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Date: 7/13/06 “PALM BEACH POLICE en Time: 9:27:55 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Case No. . . . : 1-05-000368 (Continued) the previous houseman left. Rodriguez stated that it was his responsibility to keep the identity of the masseuses private. Mr. Epstein had a massage in the morning and one in the afternoon. Mr. Rodriguez stated he would rather speak about this in private. He advised he would come to the police station to speak with me. Rodriguez stated he would return my call on Monday, November 14, 2005. I then made telephone contact with Juan Alessi. He advised he found my card on his door and wanted to know what I needed to speak with him about. I explained to Alessi that I was conducting an investigation on his former employer, Mr. Epstein. Alessi stated he would return my call shortly as he was in the middle of a project at his home. I received a telephone call from Attorney Donald Morrell from 686-2700. Mr. Morrell stated he represented Mr. Alessi and did not want me speaking with his client. I then made telephone contact with the State Attorney s Office and confirmed that subpoenas would be issued to the former employees to assist in the investigation. I then made telephone contact with Attorney Guy Fronstin, attorney for Mr. Epstein. I explained to Mr. Fronstin that I would like to speak with Mr. Epstein. He stated Mr. Epstein is not in residence in Florida at this time and would check with him to ascertain if he could be here by Wednesday November 16, 2005 for an interview. Mr. Fronstin stated he would return my call should Mr. Epstein decide to come in to the police station for an interview. Investigation continues. REKKKEKKERKEKKEEKKEEKKEEREREEEEKE NARRATIVE fo 1D RRR KKRAKKKKKKEEKERERERRERERE NA Reported By: RECAREY, JOSEPH 11/15/05 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 11/16/05 On November 14, 2005, Det. Sandman and I traveled to Florida and spoke with She was told of the ongoing investigation involving Epstein. advised she had gone to the house on several occasions. During a sworn taped statement, she advised she started going to the house approximately one year ago and was brought an Oo last name). brought her into the house and she was introduced to a Once she_met_her, MMMM brought her upstairs into a master bedroom bathroom. stated she met Jeffrey in the bathroom. He lay on the table and picked the massage oils. She provided the massage, as he lay naked on the massage bed. She stated she rubbed his calves and back area. Upon the end of the massage, Epstein removed himself from the massage table and paid her $300.00 for the massage. [| stated she had only been at the house approximately five or six times. said each time she went to the house she was notified by | Epstein's assistant, that Epstein was in town and would like her to work. stated she returned to the house and was again led upstairs by . She provided the massage, clothed.

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone686-2700

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01317277

10p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for th...

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for the authentication and admissibility of Government Exhibit 52, a contact book belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell, based on the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. The letter discusses the applicable law and provides details on Alessi's testimony, which identifies the contact book and corroborates its relevance to the case.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED /

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED / FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) MATERIAL BSF RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY SUBPOENA v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS), S.D.N.Y. In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Sealed Order, 19 Misc. 149 (Apr. 9, 2019) PLEADINGS AND ORDERS 2016-2018 Pleadings (Related Sealed) 2015-2018 Orders (Related Sealed) DISCOVERY Rule 26 Disclosures (All) Discovery Requests and Responses (served) PRODUCTIONS Plaintiff's Production 000001 009349 Defendant's Productions MAXWELL 00001 01364 Non-Party Productions CASSELL 000001 014402 MAR-A-LAGO 0001 0607 000001 000558 000001 000009 VICTIMS_REFUSE_SILENCE 0001 0091 Deposition Transcripts (ALL) April 22, 2016 De osition of Ghislaine Maxwell May 3, 2016 Deposition of May 18, 2016 Deposition of May 20, 2016 Deposition of Sky Roberts May 24, 2016 Deposition of Lynn Trude Miller May 26, 2016 Deposition of Dr. Steven Olson June 1, 2016 Deposition Transcript of Juan Alessi June 3, 2016 Deposition of David Rodgers

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70 EXHIBIT A PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS EFTA00208682 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 2 of 70 PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS Key to Objections (linking to Victims' Motion to Compel Production of Docments that Are Not Prig ileged Objection General Objections -- Inadequate Privilege Log Failure to Prove Factual Underpinnings of Privilege Claim Waiver of Confidentiality Government's Fiduciary Duty to Crime Victims Bars Privilege Communications Facilitating Crime-Fraud-Misconduct Not Covered Factual Materials Not Covered Documents Not Prepared in Anticipation of CVRA Litigation Attorney Client Objections - Ordinary Governmental Communications Not Covered Attorney-Client Relationship Not Established Deliberative Process Objections - Privilege Not Properly Invoked Final Decision Exempted from Privilege Qualified Privilege Ove

70p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

MWESTPALMBEACH OFFICE:

57p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.