Motion to Compel Production of Documents in Edwards v. Dershowitz (Case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM)
The passage is a routine docket entry confirming service of a motion to compel. It contains no substantive allegations, names only the attorneys and parties, and offers no leads on financial flows, mi Document is a filing notice for a motion to compel in a civil case. Identifies plaintiff Bradley Edwards and defendant Alan Dershowitz. Lists counsel contact information and filing date (03/24/2015).
Summary
The passage is a routine docket entry confirming service of a motion to compel. It contains no substantive allegations, names only the attorneys and parties, and offers no leads on financial flows, mi Document is a filing notice for a motion to compel in a civil case. Identifies plaintiff Bradley Edwards and defendant Alan Dershowitz. Lists counsel contact information and filing date (03/24/2015).
Persons Referenced (2)
“...8-cv-80736-KAM Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 14 of 34 Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents I HEREBY CERTIFY tha...”
Bradley Edwards“Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 14 of 34 Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documen...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (7)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08-CV-80736-KAM_scarolateam@searcylaw.comjsx@searcylaw.commep@searcylaw.comFax: (561) 383-9451(561) 383-9451(561) 686-6300Related Documents (6)
Alleged Links Between Bradley Edwards, Rothstein’s Ponzi Scheme, and Jeffrey Epstein’s Non‑Prosecution Agreement
The passage suggests a chain of actors—Bradley Edwards, lawyer Alan Dershowitz, and the late financier Rothstein—who may have leveraged Epstein’s alleged non‑prosecution agreement for extortion or bla Bradley Edwards joined Rothstein’s firm in April 2009 and allegedly showed Epstein‑related documents Rothstein’s wealth is claimed to stem from a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme running since 2005. Edwards
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH
Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM
Epstein Depositions
10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,
Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti
SE?Oet
M SE?Oet ASO Se , R‘N)C% 5C>CUMC- 7- f9 kCseriA/C GteCC Hi t\iCt :5122122, 1:31 PM --7—Jmrerepstent—galepedts Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with i November 3O, 2018. her, and paid her $2OO immediately afterward0161 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer EL-29i These and several similar lawsuits were dismissal Ea°1 All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court: b$11 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.0.21 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rietts Act by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with Epstein and his limited 2008 state plea. There was a later unsucc
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.