Obscure Chain of Custody Issues Around Redacted South Florida Police Reports Cited in House Oversight Case

10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3vlgiu2 Ll 6 As you've heard, the chain of custody behind these things after 2006 is a little sketchy. And, you know, it requires some effort. And so, you know, ordinary folks I don't believe are going to be, you know, rooting around trying to ferret out police reports from South Florida. are heavily redacted, and so when one virtually impossible to tell who's about whom, because there are lots at of police reports. We managed somehow even know how -- to get an unredacted Recarey was surprised when he saw the Even if you get them, they looks at them, it's issue, who's saying what blackouts through these and frankly, I don't copy, and Detective unredacted copy because he said, we always redact these things. And so I'm unclear as to how ours is unredacted, but in any event, there is one out there. But I don't know how we got it. The other point on this, your Honor, is, again, there is some liberty taken in the plaintiff's papers about what Ms. Maxwell said or didn't say in her deposition about these police reports, and they try to make hay over, she knew about the police reports by the selectiv deposition testimony. And I've cit in the reply brief, but what is not presentation of that ted the actual quote for you table, in my view, is that when Ms. Maxwell is presented with these police reports, it is for the first time at her deposition by Ms. McCawley, and there is an exchange in the transcript where Ms. McCawley and Ms. Maxwell are going back and forth and Ms. Maxwell says, you SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011419